| 查看: 3478 | 回复: 8 | |||||||||||||
sally208专家顾问 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
如何推荐审稿人 看看编辑怎么说 已有8人参与
|
|
经常有虫子询问如何推荐审稿人的问题，最能回答这个问题的莫过于期刊的编辑了。这里有一个美国化学会的Analytical Chemistry的主编的一个相关的评论。虽然评论的对象主要针对的AC这个期刊，但相信对其他期刊应该也是类似的。感兴趣的可以下载附件保存。 Collaborators, Colleagues, and Friends Need Not Be Listed... Jonathan V. Sweedler Anal. Chem., 2012, 84 (9), pp 3857–3857 You have spent the last month writing your masterpiece, describing a wonderful new approach for measuring the finest details on your favored material! Now is the time to submit the manuscript to your preferred journal—Analytical Chemistry. During the submission process, you are asked to suggest potential reviewers. At times, I have the feeling that authors spend months writing their paper but only a few minutes, at most, thinking about who to suggest as reviewers of their work. First, let me emphasize that your suggested reviewers are important, especially for manuscripts on subjects that are out of the ordinary, and thus, consider them wisely. These names certainly help guide our selection of reviewers: we evaluate your list of reviewers, as well as suitable reviewers that we select on our own, and typically invite a combination of your suggested reviewers and ours. So why am I writing about this? Oftentimes I am surprised at the names submitted by authors. A goal of the review process is to get an unbiased but informed opinion on the science presented in your manuscript. Thus, suggesting names of colleagues from your department or institution does not inspire confidence that these are unbiased reviewers. How can I tell if these are truly impartial experts or individuals you meet with over coffee or tea every week? Even more problematic is suggesting researchers you published with collaboratively within the last year or so. At the very least, such reviewers do not have the appearance of being unbiased, and, consequently, I tend to look at an entire list of suggestions as “biased”. Of course, many suggested names I recognize, but some I do not. How do I proceed? I, and I assume most Editors, do a quick Internet and/or more targeted search on the unfamiliar name. I find it strange when I pull up information on suggested reviewers to find that they have vibrant research programs unrelated to the paper being considered. Although such individuals may not be biased, they also may not be experts on the manuscript’s topic. When acting as an Editor, here are a few questions I ask when trying to select suitable reviewers, which you may find helpful when making your list: Have they published in the field related to the manuscript’s subject matter? Are they cited in the manuscript in a meaningful way (which certainly suggests relevant expertise)? Have they reviewed for Analytical Chemistry previously, and are their reviews of high quality? OK, you “got me” on this one: it is not really possible for the author to know, but obviously this is information we have access to and is an important consideration in selecting appropriate reviewers. Another thought in reviewer selection is whether or not the suggested reviewer has published in Analytical Chemistry. Often our authors are our best reviewers, although this criterion certainly has exceptions. And let me list a final category of suggestions to avoid en masse: Nobel Laureates, National Academy members, or researchers who retired long ago. While it may be tempting to “name drop” by only suggesting such individuals, I find that they are less likely to accept given the large number of invitations they receive; thus, they should be listed judiciously. In summary, I urge you to carefully consider your list of suggested reviewers. And remember, your friends, colleagues, and collaborators need not be listed. Your manuscript will receive a better review, and your Editor will thank you. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/ac300956s |
回复此楼» 本帖附件资源列表
-
欢迎监督和反馈：小木虫仅提供交流平台，不对该内容负责。
本内容由用户自主发布，如果其内容涉及到知识产权问题，其责任在于用户本人，如对版权有异议，请联系邮箱：xiaomuchong@tal.com - 附件 1 : Collaborators,Colleagues,andFriendsNeedNotBeListedAC2012.pdf
2012-08-13 23:15:34, 89.6 K
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 SCI写作、投稿、经验 | 污水处理 | 各种各样 | paper writing |
| 基金|期刊投稿经验 | 科研写作工具 | 文章 | 小硕读文献 |
» 猜你喜欢
一志愿重庆大学085700资源与环境总分308求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
268求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
302求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
306求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
材料学学硕080502 337求调剂-一志愿华中科技大学
已经有4人回复
-
求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
313求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
南昌大学材料专硕311分求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
316求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
346求调剂[0856]
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 评审者同意接受了，但编辑要求按审稿人意见minor revisions，怎么改？
已经有11人回复
- 审稿人提出的语句修改该如何回复编辑！
已经有7人回复
- 推荐审稿人一般怎么选？随便选还是在编辑名单里面？
已经有8人回复
- 高分求助：如何给编辑写email驳斥审稿人的审稿意见
已经有8人回复
- 审稿人对稿件很消极编辑拒了说可重投怎么办
已经有25人回复
- 编辑小修，三个审稿人有一个较为负面该怎么回答
已经有7人回复
- 编辑在什么情况下会选用自己推荐的审稿人
已经有16人回复
- 都一年多了，还没给审稿意见，催稿，编辑不停的让推荐审稿人
已经有14人回复
- 审稿人都不愿审稿，是否需要给编辑部写信推荐审稿人啊
已经有9人回复
- 如何拒绝审稿？
已经有14人回复
- 推荐的一个审稿人明显让他的学生来审稿，意见直接影响编辑决定，有必要申诉吗
已经有18人回复
- 拒稿重投的稿件到编辑那边好长时间了还没给审稿人,怎么回事?
已经有15人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
- 求助！如何向编辑询问审稿人的联系方式？
已经有30人回复
2楼2012-08-14 08:08:13
 |
3楼2012-08-14 09:17:33
pinguo
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 108 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.067
- 金币: 7423.8
- 红花: 20
- 帖子: 1982
- 在线: 316.4小时
- 虫号: 352302
- 注册: 2007-04-22
- 专业: 光谱分析
4楼2012-08-14 17:39:21
xsyang
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2679.6
- 散金: 2292
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 1238
- 在线: 276.2小时
- 虫号: 506841
- 注册: 2008-02-18
- 专业: 电子通信
5楼2012-08-14 19:55:42
xzgxzgxzg
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4722.9
- 帖子: 646
- 在线: 166小时
- 虫号: 887134
- 注册: 2009-10-29
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程海洋学
6楼2012-11-27 11:36:33
| 谢谢分享 |
7楼2013-03-29 07:09:09
gaochaoshd
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4157.5
- 散金: 46
- 帖子: 501
- 在线: 252.5小时
- 虫号: 643814
- 注册: 2008-11-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机网络
8楼2013-10-14 22:32:16
Imark
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3374.3
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 167
- 在线: 82.8小时
- 虫号: 1622369
- 注册: 2012-02-17
- 专业: 金属材料的微观结构
9楼2014-01-22 16:44:10
