| 查看: 4405 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
kyoryu木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
文章投稿连续被编辑拒，根本不送审。求分析，求推荐杂志
|
||
|
最近的一个工作，通过第一原理计算预言了一种BN和C的复合材料，具有类似石墨烯的二维结构，并且计算分析了其带隙，磁性，和光学性质。开始投到了JACS上，打算冲一下，不行的话得到审稿人意见也不错，结果连编辑那关都没过。之后投Carbon，投PRB，投JCP，都是直接被编辑拒。理由都是模版式的不适合该期刊，或者建议投更专业的期刊。文章的格式没问题，英文应该也差不多，不是很差的那种。迷茫中求虫友帮忙分析下原因，并求推荐合适的期刊。以下附上各杂志拒信： JACS： I have carefully read your manuscript. Although I think that your manuscript certainly should be published, I don't think that your computational results on materials that are unlikely to be synthesized in pure form in the near future are likely to be of significant interest to the broad readership of JACS. Consequently, I believe that, were I to send your manuscript out for review, the Referees would recommend publication of your manuscript in a more specialized journal. Therefore, I have decided not to send your manuscript out for review. My decision will enable you to submit your manuscript to a more specialized journal now, rather than waiting a month or more for the reports from JACS Referees. During the the past thirteen years, my initial assessments of how Referees will regard manuscripts have proven to be very accurate. In those cases where an author has requested that I send a manuscript for review, despite my own prediction that the Referees would not recommend publication of it in JACS, the Referees have, without any prompting from me, almost always made the recommendation I expected. Thus, the result of my sending such manuscripts for review has only been to delay by 1 - 3 months the submission of those manuscripts to other journals. I trust you will be successful in publishing your manuscript in another, more specialized journal; but thank you for considering JACS for publication of your manuscript. Carbon： The title tells me that this paper is NOT about a carbon material. It is about a carbon that contains carbon. Not the same! Therefore I must reject it. PRB： Thank you for submitting your work to Physical Review B. The editors have examined this manuscript and regrettably conclude that it is unsuitable for our journal. We make no judgment on the correctness of the work, only on its suitability according to our other criteria. JCP： I believe that your manuscript would have a better audience in another journal. [ Last edited by kyoryu on 2012-7-28 at 11:19 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 论文写作和投稿 |
» 猜你喜欢
2025年遐想
已经有4人回复
-
自荐读博
已经有9人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
-
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动
已经有4人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 投稿送审等了6个月了没音讯，杂志却找一篇文章给我审
已经有90人回复
- 没有送审，编辑说超出杂志范围，请大家帮忙看看！
已经有13人回复
- 纳米合成的文章，论文二审被拒，大家帮忙推荐个杂志吧
已经有29人回复
- UPLC-MS测定复方中三个生物碱含量,连续被i拒，不要求IF只想投一篇英文，求杂志。
已经有15人回复
- 请问，这代表什么？求指教。投稿没送审就退了回来，JAP不收计算的文章吗？谢谢
已经有23人回复
- 一文章小修，传回后，状态with editer 编辑不送审，怎么回事啊？无比的担心
已经有26人回复
- 投稿到Elsevier杂志未过技术审查，修改后再投还有可能送审吗？
已经有14人回复
- 投出去3个月了编辑没送审要不要撤稿
已经有25人回复
- 请教大家，under review这个状态是不是一定给审稿人送审了？所有杂志都这样吗？
已经有15人回复
- 求推荐几个分析方面的杂志
已经有5人回复
- 【求助】中药分析文章投稿问题，求杂志社推荐
已经有22人回复
ruber123
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2490.3
- 散金: 2075
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 459
- 在线: 278.4小时
- 虫号: 1174009
- 注册: 2010-12-20
- 专业: 高分子材料结构与性能
14楼2014-06-15 11:52:54