应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 专家们，帮忙看看“FCT审稿意见”（Major revision），有希望中不
51/1返回列表
查看: 1476  |  回复: 13
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

project008

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 专家们，帮忙看看“FCT审稿意见”（Major revision），有希望中不

The review of your manuscript submitted to Food and Chemical Toxicology is complete. The reviewers have made an important number of suggestions that will improve the quality and significance of your manuscript. I encourage you to consider these comments and make an appropriate revision of your manuscript. The reviewers' comments are below. Once you have addressed all comments by the reviewers and your revised manuscript is complete, please submit your revision online by logging onto the Elsevier Editorial System for Food and Chemical Toxicology:

Reviewer #1: Overall, the results detailed in the manuscript make sense as presented. There are grammatical and word choice issues throughout the manuscript that would need to be corrected prior to publication. Major comments concern lack of detail of methods used. Specifically, there is no detail as to how tumor weight and ascites volume were measured. Further, there was no detail for how tumor, and lymph node were collected. It is interesting that there was no discussion of pre-clinical toxicity studies with XXX. All references to XXX describe clinical studies. It might be worth some discussion of pre-clinical toxicity studies to help put the results in the current manuscript into perspective.

Reviewer #2: Minor Revision should be needed
Abstract should be modified, particularly after the objective, author must be included the little more information related methodology.
Introduction
1st paragaraph, line no 12, there are six references, keep any three or two recent references and remaining should be deleted. It may be checked throughout the text
Reference should be checked throughout the text and according the journal format

Reviewer #3:
1 - According to OECD, the treatment must be daily and continous. I suggest that you perform the tests following the OECD international protocols.
2 - You should include in your study a control group that receive only XX, without the xenograft, with the aim to observe abnormalities caused by your test-drug.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2012-07-16 21:39:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
project008: 金币+1, ★有帮助, 加分 2012-07-17 08:07:12
只是需要修改，编辑夸大了！呵呵
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2012-07-16 22:47:59
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

woshi121983

新虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
project008: 金币+1, ★有帮助, 加分 2012-07-17 08:06:59
问题不是很大啊，认真改下，基本就接收了啊！
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2012-07-16 21:46:21
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

project008

铜虫 (小有名气)
主要是第三个审稿人，是否需要补充试验研究？
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2012-07-16 22:04:33
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

szqi_75

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
只要按他们的要求修改，接收就没有问题了。专业不同，不知道他的修改意见好不好修改。应该没有问题。
赞一下 回复此楼
123
4楼2012-07-16 22:36:03
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭