24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2020  |  回复: 13

project008

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 专家们,帮忙看看“FCT审稿意见”(Major revision),有希望中不

The review of your manuscript submitted to Food and Chemical Toxicology is complete. The reviewers have made an important number of suggestions that will improve the quality and significance of your manuscript. I encourage you to consider these comments and make an appropriate revision of your manuscript. The reviewers' comments are below. Once you have addressed all comments by the reviewers and your revised manuscript is complete, please submit your revision online by logging onto the Elsevier Editorial System for Food and Chemical Toxicology:

Reviewer #1: Overall, the results detailed in the manuscript make sense as presented. There are grammatical and word choice issues throughout the manuscript that would need to be corrected prior to publication. Major comments concern lack of detail of methods used. Specifically, there is no detail as to how tumor weight and ascites volume were measured. Further, there was no detail for how tumor, and lymph node were collected. It is interesting that there was no discussion of pre-clinical toxicity studies with XXX. All references to XXX describe clinical studies. It might be worth some discussion of pre-clinical toxicity studies to help put the results in the current manuscript into perspective.

Reviewer #2: Minor Revision should be needed
Abstract should be modified, particularly after the objective, author must be included the little more information related methodology.
Introduction
1st paragaraph, line no 12, there are six references, keep any three or two recent references and remaining should be deleted. It may be checked throughout the text
Reference should be checked throughout the text and according the journal format

Reviewer #3:
1 - According to OECD, the treatment must be daily and continous. I suggest that you perform the tests following the OECD international protocols.
2 - You should include in your study a control group that receive only XX, without the xenograft, with the aim to observe abnormalities caused by your test-drug.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

woshi121983

新虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
project008: 金币+1, 有帮助, 加分 2012-07-17 08:06:59
问题不是很大啊,认真改下,基本就接收了啊!
2楼2012-07-16 21:46:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

project008

铜虫 (小有名气)

主要是第三个审稿人,是否需要补充试验研究?
3楼2012-07-16 22:04:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

szqi_75

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
只要按他们的要求修改,接收就没有问题了。专业不同,不知道他的修改意见好不好修改。应该没有问题。
123
4楼2012-07-16 22:36:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
project008: 金币+1, 有帮助, 加分 2012-07-17 08:07:12
只是需要修改,编辑夸大了!呵呵
5楼2012-07-16 22:47:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖


project008: 金币+1, 有帮助, 加分 2012-07-17 08:07:30
小修而已,按照要求修改应该没有问题。
6楼2012-07-16 22:48:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖


project008: 金币+1, 有帮助, 加分 2012-07-17 08:07:43
专业要求使用国际通用方法测试,应该可以做到
7楼2012-07-16 22:49:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖


project008: 金币+1, 有帮助, 加分 2012-07-17 08:07:53
其实大部分只是语法与语言问题,好好修改接收肯定的
8楼2012-07-16 22:49:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
project008: 金币+1, 有帮助, 加分 2012-07-17 08:08:03
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by project008 at 2012-07-16 22:04:33
主要是第三个审稿人,是否需要补充试验研究?

能补充最好,不能就尽量解释。应该没有大问题。
9楼2012-07-16 23:53:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tjegg

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
project008: 金币+1, 有帮助, 加分 2012-07-17 08:08:14
2.x分的杂志没有那么多事,只要态度认真答复他们即可。提前恭喜你了。
除了你的亲人,没有人应该对你好,对你好的人,一定要珍惜。
10楼2012-07-17 06:42:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 project008 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否 +7 启萌科技 2026-08-12 25/1250 2026-08-16 10:53 by hmhminy
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +10 majunge000 2026-08-11 12/600 2026-08-16 08:18 by xli1984
[基金申请] 小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊 +12 Tide man 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-15 16:34 by 氺木
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +10 majunge000 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-15 12:26 by hanpeng972
[基金申请] 各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。 +7 Tide man 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 01:11 by arzu_hma
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +4 yuleib84 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 23:05 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键 +23 Lanmanbaby 2026-08-09 37/1850 2026-08-14 13:40 by Equinoxhua
[硕博家园] 请教兼职经验 +3 是阿文鸭 2026-08-09 3/150 2026-08-14 12:07 by HER12025
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +4 lnee 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 10:20 by ahsoarli
[基金申请] filecode +15 documentary 2026-08-10 17/850 2026-08-14 10:08 by kissu88
[基金申请] FileCode能看出啥? +10 要乐观耀哥 2026-08-10 32/1600 2026-08-14 09:37 by 要乐观耀哥
[文学芳草园] 阿姨 +4 汪汪锅 2026-08-09 4/200 2026-08-13 19:43 by arzu_hma
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 21/1050 2026-08-13 17:56 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B? +11 Tide man 2026-08-11 11/550 2026-08-13 07:35 by 撸猫猫
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +11 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 13/650 2026-08-12 08:17 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果 +6 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-11 19:25 by Tide man
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 确定了,国自然21号放榜 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-10 19:15 by 2000zf36392
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
信息提示
请填处理意见