| ²é¿´: 3829 | »Ø¸´: 19 | |||||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||||
[½»Á÷]
ÎÒÒÔÎÒ˶ʿÂÛÎÄÄÚÈÝдµÄÂÛÎľ¹È»ËµÎÒÊdzϮ
|
|||||
|
´ó¼Ò¿´Õâ¸öÔõô°ì£¿ÎÒ×öµÄÄÚÈÝ£¬µ±Ê±ÓÐÒ»¸öÈË·¢±íÁ˲¿·Ö½á¹û£¬ÎÒÃǶþ¸ö×öµÄ½á¹ûÒ²²»Ò»Ñù¡£ÏÖÔÚ˵ÎÒ³ËûµÄ£¿ Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: I discovered that this paper is a severe case of plagiarism. The most evident proof of this plagiarism and falsification of results is Figure 3.2. The 2 pictures of locusts are copied from the paper of Sas et al. (2007). The authors used Photoshop to add a grass background to the original pictures by Sas et al. Look at the figures: the grass background in both pictures is exactly the same, which is absolutely impossible if one makes real pictures. The only difference is that the right figure is somewhat larger than the left one. Thus the treatment that the authors claim to have performed does not exist. My impression is that most of the text is copied from published papers and/or Ph.D. theses. I doubt very much that the authors did the experiments they claim to have executed. I think the results are fake. This paper should not be published under any circumstances. |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
»ù½ðºÍÂÛÎĵÄÄÇЩÊ | EC.ѧдÂÛÎÄ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0854Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÏà¹Ø×¨Òµ344Çóµ÷¼ÁË«·Ç¹¤¿ÆÑ§Ð£»ò¿ÎÌâ×é
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
300Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
291Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»¦9£¬326ÇóÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
½ÓÊÜÈκε÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§070300 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ29È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
˶ʿ±ÏÒµÂÛÎÄÖв¿·ÖÄÚÈÝÄÜ·ñÕûÀí³ÉһƪÎÄÕ·¢±í£¿
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ÎÊһϣ¬ÓÃÒѱÏҵʦÐÖµÄ˶ʿ´óÂÛÎĸijÉСÂÛÎÄ·¢±íËã²»Ëã³Ï®°¡
ÒѾÓÐ74È˻ظ´
˶ʿÂÛÎÄÖеÄÄÚÈÝ£¬¹¤×÷ºó·¢±íÎÄÕ£¬ÆÀ¸±½ÌÊÚÓÐÓ÷ñ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
×îµÍˮƽµÄÂÛÎÄд×÷¼¼ÇÉ·ÖÎö¡ª¡ªÑÏÖØµÄÂÛÎijϮ
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú£¡Ë¶Ê¿ÐÂÉúÇë½ÌдÂÛÎĵķ½·¨£¬ÊǼòµ¥µÄ¸´ÖÆÕ³ÌùÂ𣿣¿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¡¾Ë¶Ê¿¸ÐÎò¡¿---˶ʿÂÛÎÄд×÷£¬Ë¶Ê¿´ð±çºÍ´ð±çppt
ÒѾÓÐ38È˻ظ´
˶ʿ±ÏÒµÂÛÎIJ¿·ÖÄÚÈÝÄÜ·ñÓë×Ô¼ºÒÑ·¢±íµÄСÂÛÎÄÏàͬ
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
дСÂÛÎÄÈç¹ûÒýÓÃ×Ô¼ºË¶Ê¿ÂÛÎĵÄÄÚÈÝ¿ÉÒÔÂð?ÊôÓڳϮÂð?
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
l˶ʿÂÛÎÄËÍÉó¾ÓÈ»µÃÁ˸öÁ¼
ÒѾÓÐ57È˻ظ´
˶ʿ±ÏÒµÂÛÎĸÄдΪСÂÛÎĵÄÏà¹ØÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:
ºÓÄÏʦ·¶´óѧˮ²úѧԺ½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á
+1/979
Çൺ´óѧ/¿µ¸´´óѧµ¼Ê¦¿ÎÌâ×é2026Ä격ʿÑо¿Éú
+3/353
×ø±êɽ¶«£¬³ÏÕ÷Å®ÓÑ
+1/347
¡¾×ø±ê´óÁ¬¡¿92Äê±¾¿ÆÄÐÉú£¬Ñ°ÃÙÒöԵŮÉú
+5/336
˫һÁ÷ÄϾ©Ò½¿Æ´óѧÕмÆËã»ú¡¢ÉúÎïÐÅÏ¢µÈ·½ÏòÑо¿Éúµ÷¼Á
+1/134
ÍòÈËÁì¾ü
+3/131
ÐÂ¼ÓÆÂ¹úÁ¢´óѧ»¯Ñ§ÏµÁõС¸Ö½ÌÊÚ¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿Éú3-4Ãû
+1/77
°²ÐIJ¥ÖÖ£¬¾²´ý»¨¿ª
+1/68
±±¾©Àí¹¤´óѧÉò¹úÕð½ÌÊÚ¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÆ¸ÈáÐÔÖÇÄܵç×Ó·½Ïò²©Ê¿ºó
+2/48
fluent »¯Ñ§·´Ó¦²¿·ÖÔ¤»ì¡¢Èýάȫ³ß´ç¼ÆËãÂýÓëѹÁ¦Ð¡ÎÊÌâÇë½Ì
+1/38
Ïã¸Û¿Æ¼¼´óѧÓÃÓÚÏȽøLCDÆ÷¼þµÄÆ«Õñ·¢É䏯îÑ¿óÄÉÃ×°ôÔöÇ¿±¡Ä¤
+1/36
Î÷¹¤´ó¹ú¼Ò¼¶ÇàÄêÈ˲ÅÕÐÆ¸Î¢³ß¶È´«ÈÈ·½Ïò²©Ê¿ºó/Ñо¿ÖúÀí
+1/29
ÖпÆÔººÏ·ÊÎïÖÊÑо¿ÔºÕÐÆ¸Ë®ÏµÐ¿µç²©Ê¿ºó£¨³¤ÆÚÓÐЧ£©³ÏƸº£ÄÚÍâÓÅÐ㲩ʿºó
+1/16
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧѧ˶µ÷¼Á
+1/16
ÁëÄÏʦ·¶Ñ§Ôº»¯Ñ§»¯¹¤Ñ§ÔºÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©ÖÆÒ©¹¤³ÌרҵÐèÒª´óÁ¿µ÷¼ÁÉú
+1/16
¶«±±ÁÖÒµ´óѧÁõËɽÌÊÚ¡¢Ïã¸Û³Ç´óÁõ±ò½ÌÊÚÁªºÏÕÐÊÕ¶þÑõ»¯Ì¼´ß»¯·½Ïò²©Ê¿
+1/14
À¥Ã÷Àí¹¤´óѧ»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌѧԺÕź㡢¸ßÐÀÀÏʦ¿ÎÌâ×éµ÷¼ÁÕÐÉú£¬»¹ÓÐÃû¶î
+1/11
Ïã¸Û³ÇÊдóѧ»úеϵÕŃײ©Ê¿¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÆ¸²©Ê¿ºó
+1/9
ÖпÆÔº´óÁ¬»¯ÎïËù/Ïã¸Û³ÇÊдóѧÕÐÆ¸ÁªºÏÅàÑøÓÅÐ㲩ʿºóÈ˲Å
+2/6
¡¾µ÷¼Á-΢Äɹâѧ¡¿Î÷²¿Ä³Öر¾¸ßУ£¬Ð¡ÖÚµ«ÔúʵµÄ¿ÎÌâ×é
+1/2
20Â¥2012-07-10 11:25:32
2Â¥2012-07-03 07:05:43
3Â¥2012-07-03 07:06:35
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
avast2009: ½ð±Ò+2, ¹ÄÀø½»Á÷ 2012-07-07 08:35:28
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
avast2009: ½ð±Ò+2, ¹ÄÀø½»Á÷ 2012-07-07 08:35:28
| ¡°The most evident proof of this plagiarism and falsification of results is Figure 3.2. ¡± Â¥Ö÷µÄÕâ¸öͼȷʵ»áÒýÆðÎó»á£¬¶øÇÒÂ¥Ö÷µÄ×ö·¨¡°ÐÞ¸ÄÁ˶¯Îï¶þ¸öͼµÄÕÕÆ¬ºÍ±³¾°¡±·Ç³£²»Íס£ Õâ¸öͼȷʵÔÚ±ðµÄÎÄÏ×ÉÏÏÈÓÚ·¢±í£¬Â¥Ö÷ÐÞ¸ÄͼƬµÄ´óС±³¾°µÈ£¬²¢Ã»ÓиıäͼƬµÄ±¾ÖÊ£¬ºÜÃ÷ÏÔµÄÊÇÒ»ÖÖØâÇÔÐÐΪ¡£ÏÖÔÚµÄÇé¿öÊÇÄãØâÇÔÁË Sas et al. (2007) µÄͼ£¬»òÕß Sas et al. (2007).ØâÇÔÁËÄãµÄͼ¡£Â¥Ö÷Ç¿µ÷ÓÐÕâ¸öÔͼ£¬²»ÖªÄãÓÐûÓÐÖ¤¾ÝÖ¤Ã÷ Sas et al. (2007). ØâÇÔÁËÄãµÄͼ£¿Èç¹ûÓеϰ£¬ÄÇ»¹ºÃ°ì£¬Â¥Ö÷Ö»ÊÇÒýÓÃÁË×Ô¼ºµÄÔͼ¶øÒÑ¡£²»¹ý¼´Ê¹ÊÇÒýÓÃ×Ô¼ºµÄͼ£¬ÔÚͶ¸åʱҲҪÃ÷È·µÄÉùÃ÷£¬¶øÇÒÒ»°ã»¹ÒªÓÐËùÓÐÔͼ³ÖÓÐÕßµÄÊéÃæÍ¬ÒâÉùÃ÷£¨×Ðϸ¿´¿´Í¶¸å˵Ã÷£¡£©¡£Èç¹ûûÓÐÖ¤¾ÝµÄ»°£¬Â¥Ö÷µÄÐÐΪ¿ÖÅÂÕýÈçÉó¸åÈËËù˵µÄÄÇÑù¡°a severe case of plagiarism¡±£¬ËäÈ»ÄãÐÞ¸ÄÁËͼƬÊÔͼ¼ÓÒÔÑÚÊΡ£ |
4Â¥2012-07-03 07:34:02













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥