| ²é¿´: 861 | »Ø¸´: 3 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
1058815419aͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÄÄλӢÓï¸ßÊÖ¿ÉÒÔ°ïæ·ÒëÒ»ÏÂÂÛÎĵÄÕªÒª°¡£¬Ð»Ð»ÁË¡£
|
||
|
ð¢É½°åÔæµÄÓªÑø³É·Ö·ÖÎö ÕªÒª£º²ÉÓùú±ê·ÖÎö·¨¼°ÊµÑéÊÒ³£¹æ·½·¨¶Ôð¢É½°åÔæºÍÁÙÏØºìÔæµÄÖ¬·¾¡¢»¹ÔÌÇ¡¢Ëá¶È¡¢»Ò·Ö¡¢Fe¡¢Ca¡¢VC¼°ÉÅʳÏËάµÈÓªÑø³É·ÖµÄº¬Á¿½øÐвⶨ¡£½á¹û±íÃ÷£ºð¢É½°åÔæ¡¢ÁÙÏØºìÔæµÄ»¹ÔÌǺ¬Á¿·Ö±ðΪ48.4%¡¢36.5%£»ð¢É½°åÔæµÄÖ¬·¾º¬Á¿Îª0.50%£¬±ÈÁÙÏØºìÔæµÄµÍ1.5%£»ð¢É½°åÔæ¡¢ÁÙÏØºìÔæµÄ»Ò·Öº¬Á¿·Ö±ðΪ1.53%¡¢1.23%£¬Feº¬Á¿·Ö±ðΪ35 mg/kg¡¢33mg/kg £¬CaµÄº¬Á¿·Ö±ðΪ373mg/kg¡¢256mg/kg£»ð¢É½°åÔæ¡¢ÁÙÏØºìÔæµÄ×ÜÉÅʳÏËάº¬Á¿·Ö±ðΪ5.7%¡¢3.0%£¬ð¢É½°åÔæ¡¢ÁÙÏØºìÔæµÄËá¶È·Ö±ðΪ3%¡¢5%£¬ð¢É½°åÔæ¡¢ÁÙÏØºìÔæµÄVCº¬Á¿·Ö±ðΪ 16.9mg/100g¡¢14.5mg/100g¡£Óɴ˿ɼû£¬ð¢É½°åÔæÓªÑøÎïÖʷḻ£¬¾ßÓнϸߵÄÓªÑø¼ÛÖµºÍ±£½¡×÷Óã¬ð¢É½°åÔæµÄ¿ª·¢ºÍÀûÓÃÓÐ×ŷdz£¹ãÀ«µÄǰ¾°¡£ ¹Ø¼ü×Ö£ºð¢É½°åÔæ£»ÁÙÏØºìÔæ£»ÓªÑø³É·Ö£»·ÖÎö£»±È½Ï |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
288Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
321Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤´óѧ0703»¯Ñ§318·Ö£¬ÓпÆÑоÀú£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
307Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
266Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
085601²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
±¾ÈË¿¼085602 »¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì ר˶
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì½ò´óѧ»¯Ñ§¹¤ÒÕרҵ£¨081702£©315·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶274Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÉÂÎ÷ʦ·¶´óѧÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷°²½»Í¨´óѧ²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìרҵ 282·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´

yanjuan0714
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- ·ÒëEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1955.4
- É¢½ð: 20
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 763
- ÔÚÏß: 515.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 435664
- ×¢²á: 2007-08-25
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: É«Æ×·ÖÎö
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ: ½ð±Ò+1 2012-06-19 19:36:52
1058815419a: ½ð±Ò+50, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2012-06-20 18:30:35
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ: ½ð±Ò+1 2012-06-19 19:36:52
1058815419a: ½ð±Ò+50, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2012-06-20 18:30:35
|
The analysis of nutritional content in Jishan jujube Abstract International analysis method and conventional laboratory method were employed in the analysis of nutritional content such as fat, reducing sugar, acidity, ash content, Fe, Ca, Vc and dietary fiber in Jishan jujube and Linxian jujube. It indicated that the reducing sugar of Jishan jujube and Linxian jujube were 48.4% and 36.5% respectively. The fat of Jishan jujube was 0.5% which was 1.5% below that of Linxian jujube. The ash content of Jishan jujube was 1.53% and that of Linxian jujube. Besides the Fe content of Jishan jujube and Linxian jujube were 35 mg/kg and 33 mg/kg. The Ca content of Jishan jujube was 373 mg/kg which was 117 mg/kg more than that of Linxian jujube. Respectively the total dietary fiber content of Jishan jujube and Linxian jujube were 5.7% and 3.0%. But the acidity of Jishan jujube was 3% lower than that of Linxian jujube whose acidity was 5%. The Vc content of Jishan jujube was 16.9 mg/100mg, which was higher than that of Linxian jujube, and the Vc content of Linxian jujube was 14.5 mg/100mg. It can be seen that Jishan jujube has abundant nutrition, highly nutritional value and fairly health care effect. And there will be broad prospects in its exploitation in the future. Key words: Jishan jujube; Linxian jujube; nutritional content; analysis; compare |
3Â¥2012-06-19 16:44:17













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥