24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

nx8011

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 7 (幼儿园)
金币: 239.9
散金: 397
红花: 4
帖子: 181
在线: 278.6小时
虫号: 1784671
注册: 2012-04-28
专业: 昆虫学

[求助] （高难度）BB求帮忙解答这个老外的审稿提问！非常感谢！

（高难度）BB求帮忙解答这个老外的审稿提问！非常感谢！老外审稿直接在我提交的文章中，而其在其它手写的英文我又看不太懂，求各位高手帮忙解答一下哈，谢谢，现粘上一小部分本人不懂的老外原笔记。

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

博士读完未来一定会好吗已经有6人回复
小论文投稿已经有3人回复
Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了已经有9人回复
心脉受损已经有3人回复
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗已经有8人回复
申请2026年博士已经有6人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。已经有5人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

目前一篇SCI论文正在审稿中，但现在发现了文章中的一些问题，怎么办已经有41人回复
JACS审稿问题.... 已经有21人回复
急求高手帮忙外飘水加氢。非常感谢！！！已经有8人回复
JCA审稿意见返回，编辑要求很严厉，语言的问题，想找一个公司帮忙改，大家推荐下已经有12人回复
DSC作图，做不出来了，求哪位高手帮忙做一下图，非常感谢~ 已经有7人回复
minor revision，除了问题的回答外，一些套话要怎么写的，比如感谢审稿人什么. 已经有13人回复
中国物理快报审稿问题，懂的请看一下，谢谢！已经有19人回复
【求助】小弟ATK计算的文章，求助审稿人关于能带的一个问题！江湖告急！望大家多帮忙已经有9人回复
【求助】帮忙看这个审稿意见如何回复已经有3人回复
【求助】紧急求助！审稿人问关于N2吸脱附表征的问题，这该怎么解释啊？？？？已经有5人回复
【求助】请帮忙回答审稿人提出的问题已经有9人回复

1楼2012-05-24 14:28:16

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

ahelix

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 32 (小学生)
金币: 1299.3
红花: 2
帖子: 210
在线: 222.3小时
虫号: 1415553
注册: 2011-09-24
专业: 免疫相关疾病诊疗新技术

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
nx8011: 金币+12, ★★★★★最佳答案, 谢谢了哈。 2012-05-24 14:53:16

This is too vague.

In full at the start of a sentence.

There should be a space before each year.

if of current interest.

A non-toxic insecticide is not much use. Also there is no evidence that plant extracts will not select for resistance just as quickly as conventional drugs

Meaning unclear-'transmission'? do you mean dispersal?

It is important that you provide some detail about how clinical was measured.

By 'all' scabs do you mean that the left ear was completely cleared of any scab material? You need to be very precise here. Or do you just mean some or most scabs were removed?
Was tgus done at each inspection? OR just once?

Were both ears treated?
How much (volume) of the extract was administered
How was it applied, how did you ensure it stayed in the ear. Did you tape the ear closed after administration or use a cotton wool plug-etc.

It's not clear this means

AGAIN DETAIL NEEDED
Refer to Table 1

as the percentage change in mite numbers before and after treatment
Summarise in the text.

Does it actually make any difference what softwareyou used-do they give different answers?

Your paper must 'stand alone' ie you need to explain what you did, not just expect your readers to refer to previous papers.

Biblography formatting needs attention-at present it is inconsistent.

What are these numbers?