| 查看: 551 | 回复: 2 | ||||
[交流]
投稿前的检查 已有1人参与
|
|
Have you --------------? 1 spell checked the whole paper? 2 rewritten your paper at least three times? 3 stopped working on your paper for a day? To see and hear your words better when you look at it again. 4 put your main point into your title? 5 put your most significant findings first? Your gold first? 6 made it easy for readers to tell from your title and your abstract what is new and important about your work? 7 made sure all your verbs and subjects match? Plural verbs have plural subjects? Singular verbs have singular subjects? 8 spelled the same name exactly the same way throughout your paper? NOT “Bragg. . . .Brag” BUT BRAGG every time! 9 asked a friend or a native English speaker to read your paper and tell you what’s confusing or unclear? 10 changed nouns to adjectives when necessary? NOT “three dimension ordered array” BUT “three dimensional ordered array” 11 used active verbs rather than passive verbs as much as possible? NOT “The effects were investigated. . .” BUT “We investigated the effects” 12 found a way to break a sentence that’s much too long (over 4 lines) into two sentences? 13 broken up a paragraph that is way too long into two paragraphs? 14 tried to reduce your paper to its skeleton by making a one page outline of it? Might help you see if your paper is organized in the best possible way. 15 Made all equivalent items look the same? NOT “scheme 1 . . . .Scheme 2” BUT “Scheme 1. . . Scheme 2” 16 removed all contractions, such as “can’t” or “couldn’t”? and changed them to “cannot” or “could not”? 17 checked the columns of numbers in your Tables and made all the decimal points in the same column line up vertically? 18 put a noun right after “this” or “these” every time you use one of those words? 19 moved “however” away from the beginning of sentences to a spot later in a sentence where it sounds better? 20 made all your abbreviations the same? NOT 48 hrs 3 hours 2 h five h BUT 48 h 3 h 2 h 5 h 21 used strong definite words? NOT “We have been interested in” BUT “We have focused on” 22 used parallel wording where you lead your readers to expect it? NOT “not only for fabricating. .but also for reduction” BUT “not only for fabricating. . .but also for reducing. . .” OR “not only for the formation of. . .but also for the elimination of. . “ Don’t mix words ending in “ing” with “ion” words. 23 proofread your paper 3 times? At least! 24 read your paper aloud to yourself? 25 Did you use “later” when you meant “latter”? 26 looked for fruit in your figure captions? A fig is a fruit you can eat, but “Fig.” is the correct abbreviation for “Figure.” Don’t forget the period in the abbreviation. 27 proofread your references? Made sure that a journal title, no matter how often it [ Last edited by javadig on 2012-5-22 at 12:45 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 科研软件教程 |
» 猜你喜欢
提交了我也来说说感想
已经有9人回复
-
投稿求助，期刊
已经有4人回复
-
评审有感
已经有26人回复
-
今年审到国自然15份，谈谈感受
已经有22人回复
-
Sci. Bull. 悲剧经验
已经有8人回复
-
河北省自然科学基金
已经有4人回复
-
投MDPI的三个期刊都被桌拒
已经有4人回复
-
献血感触
已经有12人回复
-
云南大学材料与能源学院解琳课题组钙钛矿博士招生
已经有6人回复
-
反应很差，大量原料没有反应
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 如何查看文章状态
已经有5人回复
- Elsevier 在线投稿能看到生成的pdf，但是参考文献检查结果不正确，请问是为什么呢
已经有6人回复
- elsevier投稿：技术检查后，重新提交时，不小心删除submission了，怎么办？
已经有4人回复
- 论文修改-UKspelling，大家的英语拼写检查都怎么搞的？
已经有3人回复
- 说说elsevier的期刊的技术检查
已经有13人回复
- prb投稿，参考文献格式检查总是有错
已经有3人回复
- 大家交流下elsevier 的technical 检查，挺郁闷的
已经有23人回复
- Materials Science & Engineering A投稿的技术审查
已经有7人回复
- 急啊！技术审查不过关，求助虫子前辈们一些问题，望指导！
已经有12人回复
- SCI论文投稿前28个细节检查
已经有35人回复
- Materials letters投稿技术审查结果求助
已经有30人回复
- 急求：投稿审查要求修改英语语法，如何回复啊？
已经有20人回复
- PHYSICS LETTERS A 的技术检查结果，是否需要改语言？
已经有4人回复
- 急问：EPS图片没有通过IEEE的技术检查，怎么解决
已经有9人回复
2楼2012-05-22 10:04:21
w_wwb
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 56 (初中生)
- 金币: 11485.5
- 散金: 200
- 红花: 38
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 8070
- 在线: 666.1小时
- 虫号: 907974
- 注册: 2009-11-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学
3楼2012-05-22 11:56:24
5