24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xxbis09

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

应助: 453 (硕士)
金币: 14363.9
帖子: 10465
在线: 976.4小时
虫号: 580803

[交流] 请问下主编这么回复是什么意思？

第一次主编的回复：
Thank you for your recent submission to Journal of Materials Chemistry and please accept our apologies for the unusual length of the review process on this occasion for the journal. In this case we received two conflicting referee reports and so a third referee had to be consulted. We have now received the reviewers’ reports on your manuscript, which are copied below. The reviewers feel that major modifications are necessary before publication can be considered.

Based on the reviewers’ comments publication of your manuscript in its present form is not possible. However providing that the comments of the reviewers are addressed in full I will be pleased to consider a revised manuscript. The manuscript may be subject to further peer review prior to reaching a final decision on acceptance.
一开始有两个审稿人，一个小修，一个直接拒。然后主编找人仲裁了，结果给了大修。

然后我很认真地回复了问题，并作出修改。

第二次主编的回复：
Thank you for your recent submission to Journal of Materials Chemistry. Please find the reviewers’ reports on your revised manuscript copied below. The reviewers feel that the paper is unsuitable for publication in its present form, and that substantial revisions are necessary before the paper could be reconsidered for publication. We therefore feel unable to proceed with publication at this stage.
However, we would like to encourage you to fully address the concerns of the reviewers and resubmit an appropriately revised manuscript to Journal of Materials Chemistry. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to further peer review before a decision is reached.
审稿人只有一个人回复，提了两个问题。

这个是第三次主编的回复：
Thank you for your recent submission to Journal of Materials Chemistry. I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been recommended for publication subject to revision in line with the attached reports.
审稿人意见：......So, I would like to suggest the authors to further revise their words in the last several paragraphs to be more rigorous. Other than that, I would like to suggest this paper to be published on JMC. （感觉像是仲裁的那个人的问题）

我没有采纳审稿人的意见，但是做出一些修改。然后又提交了过去。现在已经过了5天了，还没有消息。我想问一下，这次主编还会送审吗，还是他自己来判断？这个接收的概率有多大啊？请教各位前辈们，给小虫一点提示吧！！现在心里还很忐忑，跪求正解！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！
如果接收，必定重奖各位前辈！！！！！

回复此楼

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2012-05-15 11:26:20

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

xxbis09

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

应助: 453 (硕士)
金币: 14363.9
帖子: 10465
在线: 976.4小时
虫号: 580803

引用回帖:

23楼: Originally posted by shenjijia at 2012-05-15 21:31:34:
原则上说这篇稿件应该是被接收了。但遗憾的是作者如果没有按照审稿人的意见，修订最后几段文字以求更为严谨，被拒的的可能性虽说不大，但一定还是存在。为什么拿自己辛勤劳动的成果这么不重视呢？！

因为如果按照最后一个审稿人的意见，论文里有很多地方的数据都要连带更改，这样变动就很大了，可能就要重新送审了，所以我还是坚持了自己的观点，