24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 509  |  回复: 2

youyupianyu

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 求翻译

In the last section, two different EC models were introduced.
First, a simple model based on an EC of three RC-elements and
second a more complex model based on Zarc and Warburg elements.
The parameters of both ECs were estimated by a fitting
for a large number of measured impedance spectra. It was shown
that the simple EC was not able to reproduce the measured data
even with optimized parameters sufficiently. In opposite, the more
advanced EC was reproducing the spectra very accurate. Since for
Zarc as well as Warburg elements no Laplace transformation exists,
approximations were derived. These gained ECs were implemented
in cell models. Afterwards both models were validated against different
experimental data as cell characterization tests, test cycles
and drive cycle.
All validations showed that both models predict cell voltage very
precisely. Although the simple EC was not able to reproduce the
impedance curves, voltage was predicted with a high quality. Comparisons
of both models evidenced an up to 20% higher mean error
for the simple model by a minimum doubled computation speed.
However, also the mean error for this model is just in the range of
a few mV. Therefore it can be concluded that the impedance fitting
plays a role for the simulation quality, but the influence is just small
and voltage can also be predicted accurately by simple EC models.
To sum up, both EC models allow a very precisely prediction of
battery voltage and battery performance. Thus it is possible to use
these battery models for simulations of e.g. consumption, vehicle
range, cooling requirement and battery lifetime prognosis.
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

8814402

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

In the last section, two different EC models were introduced.
First, a simple model based on an EC of three RC-elements and
second a more complex model based on Zarc and Warburg elements.
在最后一节,介绍了两种不同的EC模型。其一是一种基于三种RC-元素(原理?)的EC的简单模型,其二是基于Zarc和Warburg原理的较为复杂的模型。
2楼2012-05-14 10:53:02
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

8814402

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

虽然不完全懂你的专业,但感觉你这个材料不难的,上面给你起个头,你自己来,确有问题的句子你提出来,我和别的顾问可以有针对性的帮你看看。大段简单的谁也没时间来做啊
3楼2012-05-14 11:00:33
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 youyupianyu 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 系统查不到 +11 董八千 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 18:06 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +16 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-28 17:09 by winsaint
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +11 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 12/600 2026-08-28 16:26 by lyxiaomc
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +8 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 8/400 2026-08-28 14:41 by lkforward
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 申请删除本帖 +6 lyz123lyz 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-27 17:31 by 宁静致远sy
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +3 myrtle 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-27 10:01 by angelyueyi
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +7 process2012 2026-08-23 10/500 2026-08-26 19:23 by hmhminy
[基金申请] 范进中举一文的中心思想 +9 炎黄贵胄 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-26 15:40 by semaglutide
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 国合现在查不到了吗? +10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
信息提示
请填处理意见