24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2830  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

Awind

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 评审者同意接受了,但编辑要求按审稿人意见minor revisions,怎么改?

虽然有个response评审者有同意见,但让以后深入研究,并且同意接受了,但编辑要求按审稿人意见minor revisions,这怎么改,改什么呢?(只有一个审稿人)

The reviews are in general favourable and suggest that, subject to minor revisions, your paper could be suitable for publication.  Please consider these suggestions, and I look forward to receiving your revision.

REVIEWER COMMENTS

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Accept

Comments:
I do not agree the explanation about the improvement in the index clock (response 2 to my comment). I do not think the bright is the cause about the improvement. Nevertheless I do not hesitate about the improvement (sharpness) achieved by the  algorithm. I only would remark in the manuscript that fact  and I would indicate that a more detailed study would be necessary in the future.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chemwanglmg

铁杆木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

其实审稿人已经觉得文章可以接受发表了,但是编辑同意审稿人的关于第一审comment #2的观点,可能是对the bright 解释的证据不足,希望你改变一下文中的表述方法。据推测,审稿人认可你的工作对获得好的sharpness的贡献。因此你可以把在你文中明确论断关于the bright改善的句子表达为类似:Further more detailed study is underway on the cause about the improvement of the bright.表明你也正在找原因,别人也可以在该方面开展工作。因为不懂你的学科,也不知道论文原文,仅供参考。
10楼2012-05-26 08:48:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 Awind 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见