| ²é¿´: 8867 | »Ø¸´: 13 | |||||||||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||||||||
lzx0508ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÏêϸµÄResponse LetterÄ£°å
|
||||||||
|
һƪApplied Optics µÄÂÛÎÄ£¬±à¼ÒªÇó´ó¸Ä£¬ÇóÏêϸµÄResponse LetterÄ£°å£¬Çë·¢ËÍÖÁ09111031@bjtu.edu.cn,¶àл¶àл~! [ Last edited by nsp27 on 2012-5-19 at 10:54 ] |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
SCIд×÷¡¢Í¶¸å¡¢¾Ñé | ¿ÆÑÐ×ÊÁÏ | ¿ÆÑбر¸ÖªÊ¶ | ÌÔÌÔ£¬È»ºóÔÙÌÍÌÍ |
Ó¢ÎÄÂÛÎÄͶ¸å | SCIͶ¸å | asdf |
» ±¾ÌûÒÑ»ñµÃµÄºì»¨£¨×îÐÂ10¶ä£©
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±»¯085600²ÄÁÏר˶275|ÓÐÎÄÕÂרÀû£üÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÀí£¬ÊýÒ»Ó¢Ò»285ÇóAÇøµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
289Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ʳƷ¹¤³Ìר˶һ־ԸÖк£Ñó309Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧѧ˶£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ºþÄÏ´óѧ£¬³õÊԳɼ¨338
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
321Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
343Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
305Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
±¾¿ÆÐÂÄÜÔ´¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³Ì£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÀíÄܶ¯285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
332Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
´ó¼Òдresponse letter Ò»°ãÓÃyou»¹ÊÇÖ±½ÓÓÃthe reviewer?
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÇóResponse to ReviewsÄ£°å£¬Ð»Ð»~
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
response letterµÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ËÄǶùÓÐcover letter µÄÄ£°å£¿£¿
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ACS IECRÆÚ¿¯ µÄ Response to Decision Letter
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
´óÐ޻ظ´µÄresponse letter ºÍ cover letter ÓкÎÇø±ð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
CCͶ¸å±»Öٲã¬ÈçºÎдresponse letter
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚResponse letter£¬ÎÊÌâÈç´ËÖ®¶à£¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÇóJAP¿¯Îïresponse letterµÄÄ£°å
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ð޸ĺóµÄcover letterºÍResponse to Referee
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕÂÒªÇóÐ޸ģ¬Çóresponse to reviewµÄÄ£°å
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
¼±ÇóÐ޸ĸåcover letter ºÍ response letterÄ£°å
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
mpcctv
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
Peter
- Ó¦Öú: 1650 (½²Ê¦)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.314
- ½ð±Ò: 9743.6
- É¢½ð: 5975
- ºì»¨: 43
- ɳ·¢: 111
- Ìû×Ó: 6607
- ÔÚÏß: 720.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 736508
- ×¢²á: 2009-03-31
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÀíÂۺͼÆË㻯ѧ
- ¹ÜϽ: ǩָ֤ÄÏ

3Â¥2012-05-05 21:36:16
sesame_oil
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 4518 (¸±½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 2.947
- ½ð±Ò: 35328.4
- É¢½ð: 385
- ºì»¨: 188
- ɳ·¢: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 18585
- ÔÚÏß: 536.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1188734
- ×¢²á: 2011-01-12
- רҵ: ¼ÆËã»úÓ¦Óü¼Êõ
- ¹ÜϽ: ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
ÇïÌì°×ÔÆ: ½ð±Ò+1, ¸Ðл½»Á÷£¡ 2012-05-05 21:10:26
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
ÇïÌì°×ÔÆ: ½ð±Ò+1, ¸Ðл½»Á÷£¡ 2012-05-05 21:10:26
|
дÁ½¸öwordÎĵµ¡£ Ò»¸ö: Dear editor: thank for your ½ÓÒ»ÏÂ¿ÍÆøµÄ»°¡£È»ºó¼ÓÉϸæËßËûÎÄÕÂÒѾ°´ÕÕÒªÇóÐÞ¸ÄÁË¡£ ÊðÃû ÁíÒ»¸ö£º 1 question: answer: 2 question: answer: 3 4 ÒÔÏÂÀàÍÆ |

2Â¥2012-05-05 20:18:28
visitor958
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
IEEEÔÓÖ¾Óë»áÒéר¼Ò
- Ó¦Öú: 2283 (½²Ê¦)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.05
- ½ð±Ò: 17310
- É¢½ð: 2544
- ºì»¨: 76
- Ìû×Ó: 15735
- ÔÚÏß: 2926.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 489254
- ×¢²á: 2008-01-01
- רҵ: IEEE
4Â¥2012-05-05 22:49:40
paperhunter
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
»¹Ã»ÏëºÃ
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +14 - SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 14603 (½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 11.659
- ½ð±Ò: 345467
- É¢½ð: 9262
- ºì»¨: 1423
- ɳ·¢: 2016
- Ìû×Ó: 127554
- ÔÚÏß: 8880.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 971012
- ×¢²á: 2010-03-14
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
- ¹ÜϽ: ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
lzx0508: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2012-05-08 13:50:24
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+5, »ØÌûÒ²¾«²Ê 2013-11-05 14:27:22
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
lzx0508: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2012-05-08 13:50:24
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+5, »ØÌûÒ²¾«²Ê 2013-11-05 14:27:22
|
Dear Editor and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers¡¯ comments concerning our manuscript entitled ¡°Paper Title¡± (ID: ÎÄÕ¸åºÅ). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer¡¯s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer¡¯s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (¡¡¼òÒªÁгöÒâ¼û¡¡) Response: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á 2. Response to comment: (¡¡¼òÒªÁгöÒâ¼û¡¡) Response: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á ¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£ ÖðÌõÒâ¼û»Ø´ð£¬ÇмÉÒ»¶¨²»ÄÜÓÐÒÅ© Õë¶Ô²»Í¬µÄÎÊÌâÓÐÏÂÁм¸¸öÀñòÊõÓï¿ÉÊʵ±ÓÃÓ㺠We are very sorry for our negligence of ¡¡... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ¡¡... It is really true as Reviewer suggested that¡¡ We have made correction according to the Reviewer¡¯s comments. We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer¡¯s suggestion As Reviewer suggested that¡¡ Considering the Reviewer¡¯s suggestion, we have ¡¡ ×îºóÌØÒâ¸ÐлһÏÂÕâ¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£º Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: ͬÉÏÊö Reviewer #3: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of ¡°¡¡¡± were corrected as ¡°¡¡¡¡¡± 2. Line 107, ¡°¡¡¡± was added 3. Line 129, ¡°¡¡¡± was deleted ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers¡¯ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2083980 |

5Â¥2012-05-05 23:29:51














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
csuxjtu