24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

lzx0508

铜虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 92.8
红花: 1
帖子: 24
在线: 7.9小时
虫号: 1019991
注册: 2010-05-16
专业: 光子与光电子器件

[求助] 求详细的Response Letter模板

一篇Applied Optics 的论文，编辑要求大改，求详细的Response Letter模板，请发送至09111031@bjtu.edu.cn,多谢多谢~!

[ Last edited by nsp27 on 2012-5-19 at 10:54 ]

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

SCI写作、投稿、经验	科研资料	科研必备知识	淘淘，然后再掏掏
英文论文投稿	SCI投稿	asdf

1楼2012-05-05 20:05:02

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

专家经验: +14
SEPI: 1
应助: 14603 (教授)
贵宾: 11.659
金币: 345462
散金: 9262
红花: 1423
沙发: 2016
帖子: 127553
在线: 8880.4小时
虫号: 971012
注册: 2010-03-14
专业: 环境工程
管辖: 论文投稿

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
lzx0508: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2012-05-08 13:50:24
小木虫: 金币+5, 回帖也精彩 2013-11-05 14:27:22

Dear Editor and Reviewers:
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:
Responds to the reviewer’s comments:
Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
。。。。。。
逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏
针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：
We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...
We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...
It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……
We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.
We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion
As Reviewer suggested that……
Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……
最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：
Special thanks to you for your good comments.
Reviewer #2:
同上述
Reviewer #3:
××××××
Other changes:
1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”
2. Line 107, “……” was added
3. Line 129, “……” was deleted
××××××
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.
We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2083980