24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2492  |  回复: 22
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xuxinsheng189

金虫 (小有名气)


[交流] Major Revision: editor的建如果无法实现,如何委婉地拒绝

前几天,一篇文章修回。编辑除了说明需要按照reviewer的修改意见修改之外,还“建议”测试算法的性能(从CUTEr中选例子),原文是这样的:The associate editor and reviewers feel that the paper needs major work before
it would be suitable for publication in COAP. The reviewers give suggestions
for guidance. The numerical experiments need to be upgraded to include comparisons with other methods. Some comparisons are suggested by reviewer #1.   It is suggested that you also compare to standard software such as ALGENCAN, and then use test problems from the CUTEr library. The CUTEr testing environment is the standard environment that is used to compare algorithms. CUTEr also can be used with MATLAB
但是,本人不太熟悉如何去测试CUTEr的例子并进行比较,大家看如何委婉拒绝editor 的这个 It is suggested 啊,注意:这是编辑的建议,不是审稿人的建议。
谢谢大家
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

论文投稿经验

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhiyongwang

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)



xuxinsheng189(金币+1): 谢谢参与
委婉说出原因哈,有时候编辑也会理解的
6楼2012-04-30 11:58:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xuxinsheng189 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见