24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2930  |  回复: 14

wjl163

铜虫 (小有名气)


[交流] 有投过Journal of Testing and Evaluation的请进

小弟我去年9月底投的Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 论文方向是电子设备可靠性测试的,今年4月份杂志社过来审稿意见,是这样的

Your manuscript, referenced below, has been reviewed and found to be of potential interest:

"****************************"

Unfortunately, the manuscript is not acceptable in present form for publication in Journal of Testing and Evaluation. The reviewers have delineated several deficiencies and recommend major revisions which may render the work suitable for publication (see reviews below).

If you are willing and able to respond to each of the reviewer's critical comments, we would consider a revised manuscript. Feel free to go to the URL below to submit the revised manuscript, including figures. Please include an author response letter that addresses each point and indicates how the manuscript has been revised. Revised papers are due in the system within three weeks of this message.

下面还有两个审稿人的意见,这个期刊主要是要求审稿人在规定的几个方面进行评分,并给出修改意见的,主要如下
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
Recommendation: Mandatory Revision
1. Is the title descriptive and concise?: O
2. Does the paper contribute to the permanent literature or to the immediate interests of the technical community?: O
3. Are all descriptions of commercial products, or their use, objective and not presented in an advertising manner?: O
4. Is the paper acceptable in literary form and structure, continuity of thought, and logical development?: M
5. The Substance of the paper shall not have been published unless the paper is clearly defined as a review paper. Does the paper meet this requirement?: A
6. Is the paper concise, yet thorough? If condensation is required, please specify exactly which material is extraneous.: M
7. Are the results properly correlated with pertinent work in the field, and has that work been referenced thoroughly?: M
8. Are the illustrations readable, relevant, and adequately explained? (An indication of scale is required in all photographs): M
9. Are the trend curves properly drawn to conform with the data?: M
10. Are the materials tested, the testing conditions, and the test results sufficiently described to permit other investigators to check the procedures and the conclusions?: A
11. Are the conclusions reasonable, succinct, and consistent with the data?: O
12. Do all references provide sufficient information to enable the reader to obtain copies?: A
Rating: Average

Reviewer #2 Evaluations:
Recommendation: Mandatory Revision
1. Is the title descriptive and concise?: A
2. Does the paper contribute to the permanent literature or to the immediate interests of the technical community?: A
3. Are all descriptions of commercial products, or their use, objective and not presented in an advertising manner?: M
4. Is the paper acceptable in literary form and structure, continuity of thought, and logical development?: M
5. The Substance of the paper shall not have been published unless the paper is clearly defined as a review paper. Does the paper meet this requirement?: A
6. Is the paper concise, yet thorough? If condensation is required, please specify exactly which material is extraneous.: A
7. Are the results properly correlated with pertinent work in the field, and has that work been referenced thoroughly?: A
8. Are the illustrations readable, relevant, and adequately explained? (An indication of scale is required in all photographs): A
9. Are the trend curves properly drawn to conform with the data?: A
10. Are the materials tested, the testing conditions, and the test results sufficiently described to permit other investigators to check the procedures and the conclusions?: A
11. Are the conclusions reasonable, succinct, and consistent with the data?: A
12. Do all references provide sufficient information to enable the reader to obtain copies?: N/A
Rating: Above Average

请各位投过此杂志或有一定经验的学术高手帮忙看看,修改后录用的可能性如何
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

syhorchid

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)


按给出的修改意见进行修改和完善,还是有录用的可能的。
10楼2012-04-20 14:10:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dyfklx

新虫 (初入文坛)



wjl163(金币+1): 谢谢参与
请问你投的Journal of Testing and Evaluation这个期刊的审稿人意见中“Does the paper contribute to the permanent literature or to the immediate interests of the technical community? ”是什么意思?应该如何回答呢?我的是M,必须回答。
11楼2015-04-28 20:58:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wjl163

铜虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by syhorchid at 2012-04-19 14:24:18:
祝福

请问依据你的经验,录用可能性怎样
4楼2012-04-19 15:04:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wjl163

铜虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by neu234 at 2012-04-19 14:45:43:
祝福

你好,以你的经验录用的可能性如何啊
5楼2012-04-19 15:05:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qqllqq

木虫之王 (文坛精英)



wjl163(金币+1): 谢谢参与
Above Average
7楼2012-04-19 17:17:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

blue.wh

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)



wjl163(金币+1): 谢谢参与
大修,祝福楼主。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
8楼2012-04-19 19:06:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wxh_lcx

新虫 (初入文坛)



wjl163(金币+1): 谢谢参与
楼主你好!我现在也收到了类似的修改意见,不知怎么回答合适,能把你的经验告诉我么?或者把你当时回复的文件给我参考一下,万分感谢,就靠这个毕业呢
14楼2015-12-02 20:46:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wxh_lcx

新虫 (初入文坛)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
楼上给个意见呗,多谢,急啊
15楼2015-12-03 10:51:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
syhorchid2楼
2012-04-19 14:24   回复  
wjl163(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
neu2343楼
2012-04-19 14:45   回复  
wjl163(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
qqaoqq6楼
2012-04-19 15:58   回复  
wjl163(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福!
2012-04-19 19:09   回复  
wjl163(金币+1): 谢谢参与
clszdy12楼
2015-04-28 21:10   回复  
wjl163(金币+1): 谢谢参与
stl40913楼
2015-04-29 01:08   回复  
wjl163(金币+1): 谢谢参与
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wjl163 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见