24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

wjl163

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 16 (小学生)
金币: 440.2
帖子: 144
在线: 264.9小时
虫号: 1333632

[交流] 有投过Journal of Testing and Evaluation的请进

小弟我去年9月底投的Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 论文方向是电子设备可靠性测试的，今年4月份杂志社过来审稿意见，是这样的

Your manuscript, referenced below, has been reviewed and found to be of potential interest:

"****************************"

Unfortunately, the manuscript is not acceptable in present form for publication in Journal of Testing and Evaluation. The reviewers have delineated several deficiencies and recommend major revisions which may render the work suitable for publication (see reviews below).

If you are willing and able to respond to each of the reviewer's critical comments, we would consider a revised manuscript. Feel free to go to the URL below to submit the revised manuscript, including figures. Please include an author response letter that addresses each point and indicates how the manuscript has been revised. Revised papers are due in the system within three weeks of this message.

下面还有两个审稿人的意见，这个期刊主要是要求审稿人在规定的几个方面进行评分，并给出修改意见的，主要如下
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
Recommendation: Mandatory Revision
1. Is the title descriptive and concise?: O
2. Does the paper contribute to the permanent literature or to the immediate interests of the technical community?: O
3. Are all descriptions of commercial products, or their use, objective and not presented in an advertising manner?: O
4. Is the paper acceptable in literary form and structure, continuity of thought, and logical development?: M
5. The Substance of the paper shall not have been published unless the paper is clearly defined as a review paper. Does the paper meet this requirement?: A
6. Is the paper concise, yet thorough? If condensation is required, please specify exactly which material is extraneous.: M
7. Are the results properly correlated with pertinent work in the field, and has that work been referenced thoroughly?: M
8. Are the illustrations readable, relevant, and adequately explained? (An indication of scale is required in all photographs): M
9. Are the trend curves properly drawn to conform with the data?: M
10. Are the materials tested, the testing conditions, and the test results sufficiently described to permit other investigators to check the procedures and the conclusions?: A
11. Are the conclusions reasonable, succinct, and consistent with the data?: O
12. Do all references provide sufficient information to enable the reader to obtain copies?: A
Rating: Average

Reviewer #2 Evaluations:
Recommendation: Mandatory Revision
1. Is the title descriptive and concise?: A
2. Does the paper contribute to the permanent literature or to the immediate interests of the technical community?: A
3. Are all descriptions of commercial products, or their use, objective and not presented in an advertising manner?: M
4. Is the paper acceptable in literary form and structure, continuity of thought, and logical development?: M
5. The Substance of the paper shall not have been published unless the paper is clearly defined as a review paper. Does the paper meet this requirement?: A
6. Is the paper concise, yet thorough? If condensation is required, please specify exactly which material is extraneous.: A
7. Are the results properly correlated with pertinent work in the field, and has that work been referenced thoroughly?: A
8. Are the illustrations readable, relevant, and adequately explained? (An indication of scale is required in all photographs): A
9. Are the trend curves properly drawn to conform with the data?: A
10. Are the materials tested, the testing conditions, and the test results sufficiently described to permit other investigators to check the procedures and the conclusions?: A
11. Are the conclusions reasonable, succinct, and consistent with the data?: A
12. Do all references provide sufficient information to enable the reader to obtain copies?: N/A
Rating: Above Average

请各位投过此杂志或有一定经验的学术高手帮忙看看，修改后录用的可能性如何

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多，主要哪些原因引起的？已经有3人回复
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？已经有10人回复
版面费该交吗已经有12人回复
面上可以超过30页吧？已经有5人回复
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低已经有13人回复
“人文社科而论，许多学术研究还没有达到民国时期的水平” 已经有5人回复
什么是人一生最重要的？已经有4人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

请投过Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry请进，咨询一下已经有9人回复
投过JOURNAL OF SURFACTANTS AND DETERGENTS的虫子们请进已经有5人回复
悲催啊，Journal of Testing and Evaluation投稿烂在编辑部54天了已经有5人回复
投这个期刊的请进 Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry 已经有30人回复
Journal of Testing and Evaluation杂志状态问题已经有12人回复
有投过JNN（Journal of Nanosciece and Nanotechnology）的同学吗已经有12人回复
投过Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry请进已经有18人回复
谁投过Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry,什么时候交审稿费？已经有16人回复
投过Journal of alloys and compound 的请进，在线等！已经有5人回复
有投过Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 的吗已经有3人回复
有人投过international journal of nonlinear science and numerical simulation吗？已经有9人回复
请问有谁投过Journal of agriculture and food chemistry? 已经有11人回复
投过Journal of dispersion science and technology请进！已经有8人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2012-04-19 14:12:16

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

syhorchid

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

应助: 97 (初中生)
金币: 266233
帖子: 249669
在线: 9682.8小时
虫号: 1218959

按给出的修改意见进行修改和完善，还是有录用的可能的。

赞一下(1人)

回复此楼

10楼2012-04-20 14:10:48

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

dyfklx

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 13.3
帖子: 6
在线: 11.6小时
虫号: 1652978

★
wjl163(金币+1): 谢谢参与

请问你投的Journal of Testing and Evaluation这个期刊的审稿人意见中“Does the paper contribute to the permanent literature or to the immediate interests of the technical community? ”是什么意思？应该如何回答呢？我的是M，必须回答。

赞一下(1人)

回复此楼

11楼2015-04-28 20:58:05

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖