应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 求助完结 » 投稿European Journal of Operational Research求助！
192/2返回列表上一页12
查看: 2953  |  回复: 18
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

zhzimi_2007

木虫 (职业作家)
引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by seapass at 2012-04-11 09:56:16:
那也很正常，两次的审稿意见应该不一样了吧

我把最近的审稿意见发给您，您帮我看看：
Reviewer Comments:

Reviewer #1:

In my side of view this paper has some originality regarding to its application. Even, the author tries to mix different theories with each others, finally it give a bright-full results. However, I think there are lots of area that should be corrected and I think it was because of different amendments which were added to this paper after its first review.
1- The introduction is completely vast however it becomes to complicated while it just speak about history of the methods in details but it doesn't go through their application and definitions in general during introduction of the paper. I recommend author to re-structured the introduction and make it more readable for scholars.
2- It is a necessary to add a graphical chart at the end of introduction to avoid complication among history. the graphical chart should show the different areas that author mentioned about them and then it should illustrate the interactions and finally the contribution of this paper should be stared in the figure. It help to show the area of knowledge that author was explored in his study.
3- the contribution of this paper should be more highlighted at the end of introduction.  
4- some small English errors should be corrected such as page one, line 48, in the middle, it should be "in recent years,..."
5- the structure of paper does not obey the standard form of normal academic papers, maybe some definitions should come under methodology, and results and discussions should be more highlighted rather than lots of complicated Remarks.
6- Since the strength of this paper is more in its application, it needs to be more strong on this issue. The examples should be more applied and even some example could be comparative example which shows any differences between this method and previous ones.
7- In page 3, Line 30, It is not suitable for academic paper to use  "we"!
8- The procedure of this method should be illustrated by aid of graphical chart.
9- Conclusion should be more precise.
10- Using lots of references even at the end of the paper in remarks and results is not common and suitable at all. maybe they can be introduced as a significance of study in the introduction and at the end, the contributions should be mentioned alone.
11- Technically I like this mathematical solution in decision making. However, it will be so complicated for some scholars!




Reviewer #2:

The paper must be completely restructured.
Indeed, in its current form, the author presents:
- A set of definitions, remarks, examples, but without given textual explanations before giving the mathematical formulation.
- There are no apparent links between the different definitions, sections, etc. etc.
It should be important to:
- Explain with few words or in few lines, what is the contribution of the each definition.
- Propose the definitions with explanations, positioning, and links with what follow.
- Highlight the most important definitions to highlight the contribution of the author proportion.
On page 11, page where the author presents the proposal, we find a set of definitions, remarks and examples.
At page 11: It would be interesting that the author present the examples discussed by (Feng et al. 2010a) (Jiang et al. 2010a), and position its results regarding the obtained results by these authors. The goal is to have some elements of comparison.
Page 20: At the end of section 3 (proposed approach) there is no balance and the relationship between sections 3 and 4 (the author deal with 'Weighted interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based decision making', again without link, explanations .).
We must wait the page 25 for having explanations: the author explains the benefits of its proposition, but as he does not position this proposition regarding other examples (examples discussed in (Feng et al. 2010a) (Jiang et al. 2010a)) ? The interest is not highlighted.
At the end of page 25, the explanations are presented without giving links with the different definitions, remarks, examples (presented at the beginning of the paper) ? the benefit of the proposed approach is less visible.
It is also the case for 'Weighted interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based decision making' section. Moreover, the author does not position its proposition, without links .
A discussion on the types of problems that can be used with the proposed approach is important.
What about the following works: (Wang et al., 2009), (Zhang, 2011) regarding the proposed paper:
Zhoujing Wang, Kevin W. Li, Weize Wang, 2009, An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights. Information Sciences 179, 3026-3040.
Zhiming Zhang, 2011, A rough set approach to intuitionistic fuzzy soft set based decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling.
赞一下 回复此楼
11楼2012-04-11 09:57:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

seapass

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

超哥

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
zhzimi_2007: 金币+2 2012-04-14 14:12:38
zhzimi_2007: 金币+1 2012-04-14 14:14:21
文章确实有很大的问题。。。第一个审稿人给的意见都很具体有效，至少可以看出你文章结构组织很有问题，单前沿你就写得很不好，空泛，罗列一些前人研究，把别人看晕了，一定要突出主次，突出文章的要点。
赞一下 回复此楼
独上高楼。。。
12楼2012-04-11 10:16:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhzimi_2007: 金币+2 2012-04-14 14:12:33
这个杂志，你认真改几次就可以了，不过一定要认真。而且你要有耐心，这个杂志（有时）比较慢。
赞一下 回复此楼
13楼2012-04-11 17:02:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hupheng

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
这可能是直接在编辑的手里就聚掉了
赞一下 回复此楼
14楼2012-04-11 17:06:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhzimi_2007

木虫 (职业作家)
引用回帖:
13楼: Originally posted by visitor958 at 2012-04-11 17:02:00:
这个杂志，你认真改几次就可以了，不过一定要认真。而且你要有耐心，这个杂志（有时）比较慢。

楼主，非常感谢您的回复。您投过该杂志吗？如果投过的话，经历是否和我的一样，这个杂志，是不是没有大修这个状态，一直让人修改重投啊？
赞一下 回复此楼
15楼2012-04-12 15:26:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhzimi_2007

木虫 (职业作家)
引用回帖:
13楼: Originally posted by visitor958 at 2012-04-11 17:02:00:
这个杂志，你认真改几次就可以了，不过一定要认真。而且你要有耐心，这个杂志（有时）比较慢。

楼主，非常感谢您的回复。您投过该杂志吗？如果投过的话，经历是否和我的一样，这个杂志，是不是没有大修这个状态，一直让人修改重投啊？
赞一下 回复此楼
16楼2012-04-13 22:53:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xliu_mel

金虫 (小有名气)

中山北路文艺青年

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhzimi_2007: 金币+2 2012-04-14 14:12:24
zhzimi_2007: 金币+1 2012-04-14 14:14:01
只要两次意见不一样，就说明的确走的是revise and resubmit的过程。所以个人建议楼主如果觉得这次回来的修改意见还是在可以修改的范围内的话，还是认真的修改，下次就很有可能是major revision了。毕竟同样的审稿人看了两轮了，应该是有希望的。不过前提一定要是认真的修改和回复。

祝楼主好运！
赞一下 回复此楼
坚持就是胜利！
17楼2012-04-13 23:23:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

renochen

禁虫 (小有名气)
本帖内容被屏蔽
18楼2012-04-14 10:20:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

打豆豆66

新虫 (初入文坛)
楼主，我想请教一下，你这篇文章最后的结果如何呢？因为我最近也打算投这个杂志。
赞一下 回复此楼
19楼2013-10-23 22:24:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zhzimi_2007 的主题更新
192/2返回列表上一页12
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 267求调剂 +3 一个叶子zsw 2026-04-05 4/200 2026-04-11 11:23 by zhq0425
[考研] 298求调剂 +5 残荷新柳 2026-04-07 5/250 2026-04-11 11:02 by 紫曦紫棋
[考研] 化工求调剂！ +35 RichLi_ 2026-04-06 35/1750 2026-04-11 11:02 by zhq0425
[考研] 调剂 +4 电气300求调剂不 2026-04-08 7/350 2026-04-11 10:44 by 紫曦紫棋
[考研] 一志愿哈工大 085600 277 12材科基求调剂 5+5 chenny174 2026-04-10 23/1150 2026-04-11 10:43 by Delta2012
[考研] 284求调剂 +12 archer.. 2026-04-10 13/650 2026-04-11 08:44 by zhq0425
[考研] 调剂 +19 小张ZA 2026-04-10 20/1000 2026-04-10 22:08 by 猪会飞
[考研] 一志愿矿大，材料工程专硕314分，0856可调都可以 +15 无懈可击的巨人 2026-04-09 15/750 2026-04-10 18:10 by hmn_wj
[基金申请] 有爆料，一个青年教师卖房得400万，然后换了一个四青帽子 +9 babu2015 2026-04-08 9/450 2026-04-10 11:43 by 苏东坡二世
[考研] 生物学调剂，一志愿西南大学348，Top期刊一区二作、二区三作，三等奖学金三次 +4 candyyyi 2026-04-09 4/200 2026-04-09 18:39 by l_paradox
[考研] 348求调剂 +3 candyyyi 2026-04-09 3/150 2026-04-09 17:20 by 段伟艳
[考研] 一志愿厦大生物学332求调剂 +10 池池池池池池 2026-04-08 10/500 2026-04-09 17:10 by 独醉梦孤城
[考研] 304求调剂 +10 素年祭语 2026-04-06 17/850 2026-04-08 09:05 by 蓝云思雨
[考研] 调剂求助（生物与医药） +6 @6952 2026-04-06 6/300 2026-04-07 23:52 by lys0704
[考研] 生物工程求调剂 +13 喜欢还是不甘心 2026-04-05 13/650 2026-04-07 16:55 by Ecowxq666！
[考研] 085405软件工程301分求调剂，专硕可跨专业，四六级已过 +3 静静想想 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-06 15:23 by nepu_uu
[考研] 第一志愿东南大学物理313，有科研竞赛获奖经历，希望物理复试调剂 +3 马内橙 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-06 10:32 by 蓝云思雨
[考研] 319求调剂 +3 handrui 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-06 09:33 by jp9609
[考研] 331求调剂 +8 于征yz 2026-04-05 8/400 2026-04-06 00:54 by fmesaito
[考研] 可跨专业调剂 +3 周的得地 2026-04-04 6/300 2026-04-04 22:21 by barlinike
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭