| 查看: 2581 | 回复: 9 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
静远思木虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
请教高手们，小弟投JCA遇到这种情况，我是重投呢？还是改投其他，望指点！谢谢
|
|
|
Dear Dr. xxx, On behalf of the editor handling your manuscript, Dr. Fanali, I am writing to you in reference to your manuscript entitled: "Enantiomeric multi-residue analysis of pesticides in soil and water by chiral liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry" On the basis of the review(s) appended below, we regret that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Journal of Chromatography A. However, it is the opinion of the Editor that there is potential merit in the work described and that a thorough consideration of the reviewer comments might result in a publishable paper. We would therefore be willing to consider a new manuscript that describes this work. Since this will be considered as a new submittal, it can be submitted online at any future time. In such a case, in the cover letter please refer to this paper. Please upload your detailed response to the reviewers comments as a separate Response to Reviewers document. In the revised manuscript all changes made should be clearly indicated, preferably by using the "Track Changes" option in Word. Thank you for your interest in Journal of Chromatography A. Yours sincerely Jan Kastelein Journal Manager Journal of Chromatography A *************************************** Comments: Editor's comment Dear Authors Enclosed, please you find the reviewers' comments about your manuscript JCA-12-397. As you can see, although the presented topic is of interest for the readers of Journal of Chromatography A, the paper is not clearly presented and well organized. Specific criticism is reported in the enclosed e-mail and I strongly agree especially with the recommendations of the 1st and 2nd reviewers who advised the rejection. Besides these reviewers' conclusions, I believe that the work has some merit. However additional work must be done in order to clear what is new (methodologically); additional experiments or data have been advised (see 2nd report); some data must be condensed. Further information about "aims and scope" of our Journal can be obtained going at Elsevier's web site www.elsevier.com/locate/chroma *. Considering that a simple revision will not be sufficient to improve the quality of the paper, I regret to inform you that the manuscript cannot be considered for the publication in our Journal (rejected without prejudice). I thank you for sending to JCA your work. Sincerely Yours Salvatore Fanali [ Last edited by seapass on 2012-4-2 at 15:36 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有69人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有11人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有23人回复
-
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有7人回复
-
filecode
已经有12人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有13人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有7人回复
-
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有13人回复
-
各位道友，我要去昆明玩几天，回来见。
已经有8人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有22人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 工作/学习过程中遇到拦路虎怎么解决
已经有5人回复
- 请教vulcanized rubber的定义
已经有6人回复
- 请教正交试验结果分析中的问题
已经有20人回复
- 有人遇到过MS文件读写错误的情况吗？
已经有4人回复
- 谁有T2002电子万能试验机通用测控软件，能否给小弟发一份，急用啊
已经有2人回复
- 各位大侠，小弟向《中国药学杂志》投了一篇综述，小弟有几个问题请教，重金答谢！
已经有17人回复
- JCA审稿意见返回，编辑要求很严厉，语言的问题，想找一个公司帮忙改，大家推荐下
已经有12人回复
- 是改投其它期刊还是修改下原论文再投JCA？
已经有9人回复
- JCA 非一般的速度！
已经有21人回复
- 请教大家Optical Engineering的major revision是继续还是改投？
已经有16人回复
qiqiqiqi
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
小木虫发型设计师
- 应助: 1053 (博后)
- 贵宾: 0.422
- 金币: 12494.5
- 散金: 3982
- 红花: 56
- 沙发: 56
- 帖子: 7824
- 在线: 432.1小时
- 虫号: 831048
- 注册: 2009-08-20
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 半导体材料
5楼2012-03-29 10:27:04
2楼2012-03-29 09:03:07
zznjut
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
万里独行之江湖散人
- 应助: 870 (博后)
- 贵宾: 2.734
- 金币: 15769.4
- 散金: 21901
- 红花: 220
- 沙发: 418
- 帖子: 17374
- 在线: 3280.5小时
- 虫号: 837501
- 注册: 2009-08-31
- 专业: 成人教育学
- 管辖: 高分子
3楼2012-03-29 09:04:20
4楼2012-03-29 09:06:46
