24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3944)
>文献求助 (430)
>虫友互识 (344)
>导师招生 (268)
>招聘信息布告栏 (146)
>考博 (145)
>硕博家园 (139)
>休闲灌水 (91)
>论文道贺祈福 (90)
>博后之家 (86)
>论文投稿 (74)
>考研 (67)
>教师之家 (57)
>基金申请 (54)
>公派出国 (45)
>找工作 (44)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

静远思

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 3477
散金: 445
红花: 5
帖子: 708
在线: 1414.9小时
虫号: 584446
注册: 2008-08-01
性别: GG
专业: 色谱分析

[求助] 请教高手们，小弟投JCA遇到这种情况，我是重投呢？还是改投其他，望指点！谢谢

Dear Dr. xxx,

On behalf of the editor handling your manuscript, Dr. Fanali, I am writing to you in reference to your manuscript entitled:

"Enantiomeric multi-residue analysis of pesticides in soil and water by chiral liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry"

On the basis of the review(s) appended below, we regret that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Journal of Chromatography A.

However, it is the opinion of the Editor that there is potential merit in the work described and that a thorough consideration of the reviewer comments might result in a publishable paper. We would therefore be willing to consider a new manuscript that describes this work. Since this will be considered as a new submittal, it can be submitted online at any future time.

In such a case, in the cover letter please refer to this paper. Please upload your detailed response to the reviewers comments as a separate Response to Reviewers document. In the revised manuscript all changes made should be clearly indicated, preferably by using the "Track Changes" option in Word.

Thank you for your interest in Journal of Chromatography A.

Yours sincerely

Jan Kastelein
Journal Manager
Journal of Chromatography A

***************************************

Comments:

Editor's comment

Dear Authors
Enclosed, please you find the reviewers' comments about your manuscript JCA-12-397.
As you can see, although the presented topic is of interest for the readers of Journal of Chromatography A, the paper is not clearly presented and well organized.
Specific criticism is reported in the enclosed e-mail and I strongly agree especially with the recommendations of the 1st and 2nd reviewers who advised the rejection. Besides these reviewers' conclusions, I believe that the work has some merit. However additional work must be done in order to clear what is new (methodologically); additional experiments or data have been advised (see 2nd report); some data must be condensed.
Further information about "aims and scope" of our Journal can be obtained going at Elsevier's web site www.elsevier.com/locate/chroma *.

Considering that a simple revision will not be sufficient to improve the quality of the paper, I regret to inform you that the manuscript cannot be considered for the publication in our Journal (rejected without prejudice).
I thank you for sending to JCA your work.
Sincerely Yours
Salvatore Fanali

[ Last edited by seapass on 2012-4-2 at 15:36 ]

回复此楼