| 查看: 876 | 回复: 3 | |||
yaoweiwei木虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
投communication被拒,让投全文? 已有3人参与
|
|
才收到的拒稿信,悲催 Thank you for your submission to Journal of Materials Chemistry. I regret to inform you, however, that the manuscript will not be considered further as a submission to the journal. A great many more papers are submitted to Journal of Materials Chemistry than we can possibly publish and on that basis an initial selection of papers is made on the grounds of general interest and suitability for the journal. I am sorry to say that on this occasion your communication will undergo no further processing because it is not of sufficient urgency or novelty to warrant publication in this form. However, we maybe wiling to consider a revised full paper version of this work in the future providing that you compare the materials and their properties with existing state-of-the-art compounds. If you are able to show that your materials are an improvement over the state-of-the-art, then we may be willing to consider a revised version of your manuscript as a new submission at a later date. I am sorry not to have better news for you. Thank you for your interest in Journal of Materials Chemistry. Yours sincerely, |
» 猜你喜欢
材料调剂
已经有4人回复
面上模板改不了页边距吧?
已经有6人回复
307求调剂
已经有6人回复
304求调剂
已经有5人回复
317一志愿华南理工电气工程求调剂
已经有8人回复
272求调剂
已经有3人回复
化工专硕348,一志愿985求调剂
已经有6人回复
292求调剂
已经有3人回复
290求调剂
已经有6人回复
295求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
chemical communications 四天后被Publishing Editor 给拒了,要argue吗,崩溃!
已经有21人回复
是不是所有Nature系列拒之后都会建议投nature communication?
已经有8人回复
有谁投过PRB的rapid communication没有?
已经有5人回复
Chemical Communication经过第三方仲裁了,如何回答直接拒绝的那个审稿人?
已经有7人回复
ChemComm被拒,该投什么样的杂志?
已经有10人回复
Chemical communication 投稿请教
已经有5人回复
Journal of materials chemistry 的communication的投稿格式
已经有13人回复
论文投《optics communications》被拒了,改投哪里合适呢?
已经有14人回复

2楼2012-03-21 09:48:11
sesame_oil
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4518 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 2.947
- 金币: 35328.4
- 散金: 385
- 红花: 188
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 18585
- 在线: 536.5小时
- 虫号: 1188734
- 注册: 2011-01-12
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
- 管辖: 论文投稿

3楼2012-03-21 10:53:35

4楼2012-03-21 10:55:32













回复此楼