24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3587)
>文献求助 (321)
>虫友互识 (287)
>导师招生 (212)
>硕博家园 (123)
>招聘信息布告栏 (106)
>考博 (97)
>休闲灌水 (83)
>论文道贺祈福 (71)
>博后之家 (68)
>考研 (53)
>论文投稿 (52)
>教师之家 (50)
>基金申请 (43)
>公派出国 (43)
>找工作 (31)

返回列表

xan36

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 527
红花: 2
帖子: 66
在线: 29.2小时
虫号: 1429842
注册: 2011-10-07
性别: MM
专业: 白血病

[求助] 这是个什么意思？？

In my opinion, the manuscript would require significant additional data to warrant publication in RNA Biology.
前面的信中还说到
In my opinion, the manuscript would require significant additional data to warrant publication in RNA Biology.
是不是被拒了。。。

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件已经有5人回复
真诚求助：手里的省社科项目结项要求主持人一篇中文核心，有什么渠道能发核心吗已经有7人回复
论文投稿，期刊推荐已经有6人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。已经有4人回复
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷已经有14人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢已经有5人回复
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗已经有5人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果已经有3人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入已经有4人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生已经有6人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

这种审稿意见是什么意思啊？怎么回复好哦已经有41人回复
这个修改意见到底啥意思！？实验室三个人三个看法，哥彻底晕了！已经有7人回复
这是个什么意思呢已经有11人回复
请问有人知道 pseudoequatorial , pseudoaxial arrangement, 这两个什么意思么? 已经有4人回复
编辑来信，让提供一个图作为TOC，这是什么意思？已经有8人回复
这句话什么意思啊？急！已经有9人回复
ASME一个期刊审了13个月，Editor终于给我回信了，请问这是什么意思？已经有7人回复
这是个什么故事，貌似有点意思～已经有11人回复
投稿两天，编辑来信要求，第一个要求没怎么看懂。请教这是什么意思？已经有17人回复
关于H谱的，这两句话什么意思？重谢！已经有15人回复
这个导师是什么意思呢，大家帮我分析一下吧。已经有46人回复
编辑个回复的信是什么意思啊？已经有7人回复
2审意见回来了，这是什么意思？已经有62人回复
论文校样都结束了，IN PRESS中，最后来了个这个，什么意思已经有14人回复
帮忙看一下，这句话什么意思呀已经有8人回复
这是什么意思已经有21人回复

风雨后的阳光更珍贵

1楼2012-03-03 01:25:40

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖置顶 ( 共有1个 )

xan36

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 527
红花: 2
帖子: 66
在线: 29.2小时
虫号: 1429842
注册: 2011-10-07
性别: MM
专业: 白血病

xan36: 回帖置顶 2012-03-03 14:45:36

引用回帖:

12楼: Originally posted by huanwz at 2012-03-03 10:27:09:
是要你补充数据吧，没明确说是据稿啊，把编辑发的信传全了才能看明白吧

Dear Dr. Wang:

Your manuscript entitled, "A novel circularized transcript of the AML1 gene" has now been reviewed. Based on the comments of the peer reviewers, as you can see below, we are unable to offer to publish this work in RNA Biology. We realize this decision will be disappointing for you but wish you well as you submit your work elsewhere.

We are returning the manuscript as well as all reviewer comments with the hope that they will be useful as you revise your paper for another journal.

Thank you for your interest in RNA Biology and I want to encourage you to submit future work of relevance to our journal. If you have any questions, please contact the managing editor: Betsy Granger|Managing Editor, RNA Biology|Landes Bioscience|1002 West Ave., 2nd Floor|Austin, TX 78701|512.637.6050 (ph)|512.637.6079 (fax)|rnabiology@landesbioscience.com.

If I can answer any questions or you wish to discuss any aspect of the review of your manuscript, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you once again for submitting your manuscript to RNA Biology.

Sincerely,

Renee Schroeder
Max F. Perutz Laboratories
Department of Biochemistry, University of Vienna
http://www.mfpl.ac.at/index.php?cid=72
Dr. Bohrgasse 9/5
tel: 43 1 4277 54690
fax: 43 1 4277 9528
e-mail: renee.schroeder@univie.ac.at
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author):
This is a well presented analysis of a circular RNA containing exons 5 and 6 of the AML1 gene. The evidence that the transcript is circular is convincing, and the experiments performed are all unambiguous. However, the importance of this transcript is not clear, as there is no evidence that the transcript is abundant, and how it relates structurally to the many alternative splice variants known for this gene is not analysed. Because it has not been characterised with respect to other AML1 transcripts, it remains possible, for instance, that this is a low abundance processed lariat generated by a transcript variant, as has been demonstrated in the Dystrophin gene. As a result, the extensive discussion of possible roles for circular RNAs in general, while topical, is not wholly appropriate.

In addition, the authors do not cite recent analyses which show that such scrambled transcripts are now known to be common, are primarily circular, and can be abundant [Salzman et al 2012 PLOS One 7(2) e30733]. Due to this, the characterisation of a single, low abundance, circular RNA of unknown significance, is not very novel. In my opinion, the manuscript would require significant additional data to warrant publication in RNA Biology.