| 查看: 4165 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
MMOR reject and resubmit
|
|||
|
昨天刚刚收到的拒稿信，没有经验，求指点。下面是编辑的信： Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject the manuscript as is but I encourage you to resubmit the manuscript. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. Thank you for your submission to MMOR. Unfortunately, the reviews were not positive, and I must reject the paper, though I encourage you to re-submit it if you can address all comments in a revision. Two additional comment that you must address are: 1. You must demonstrate how your work fits into the current body of work. I noticed that the most recent reference is from 2007 (with only one more newer than 2000). That makes me wonder how timely and of general interest your work might be. 2. Machine scheduling is a well-know problem in the operations research, and is typically solved using integer programming. This approach can handle problems that are far more complex than the simple examples that the game theory literature solves theoretically. How does your work relate to that body of work, and what new insights can you offer. Note that in practice, integer programming has been used for decades to solve these and other operational planning problems in industry. 另外一个审稿人的意见在附件里：除了前面的肯定，主要意见是 Overall the results in the paper merit publication. The extensions considered in the paper are important - specially in Section 3. I have one major concern for the paper - its exposition needs to be better. Specially, Section 3 is very loosely written. For instance, it starts with“chain precedence constraint”without formally defining it. It is not clear what a“Sidney-component”is. Definition 1 is a mess - it can be improved by breaking it up into small bits. Theorem 6 has an incomplete sentence (the last sentence ends with the word “under”). If the writing in Section 3 is improved, I have no hesitation in recommending acceptance of this paper. 求意见，求指点 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 SCI写作、投稿、经验 |
» 猜你喜欢
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有27人回复
-
为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低？主要原因有哪些？
已经有3人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有9人回复
-
朋友圈看到的
已经有5人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有110人回复
-
明天放榜？
已经有5人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有11人回复
-
重要消息，中午系统在维护
已经有10人回复
-
两姐妹，一个辛辛苦苦30岁工作当大学教师，另一个23岁就工作当开车教练
已经有7人回复
-
投稿咨询
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- monthly ，twice monthly and weekly
已经有11人回复
- RSC的杂志，拒稿重投（reject and resubmssion）还需要回复审稿人意见吗？
已经有6人回复
- reject and resubmit
已经有13人回复
- 求助 Reject and Resubmit
已经有6人回复
- 请问 Reject (revise and resubmit) 后重投还有希望吗？
已经有8人回复
- 求助：Materials Chemistry and Physics的word 模板
已经有5人回复
- 审稿4个月，投稿系统显示Reject & Resubmit
已经有17人回复
- 关于Reject and Resubmit？？？？？？
已经有12人回复
- 【资源】Standard Handbook of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engin
已经有3人回复
- reject and resubmit
已经有8人回复
- 【求助】the French Ministry of Education and Research
已经有14人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
5楼2012-02-24 08:49:29
wuhd200577
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 26 (小学生)
- 金币: 731
- 散金: 382
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 294
- 在线: 117.1小时
- 虫号: 988817
- 注册: 2010-04-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 结构陶瓷
2楼2012-02-24 08:36:34
qiqiqiqi
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
小木虫发型设计师
- 应助: 1053 (博后)
- 贵宾: 0.422
- 金币: 12494.5
- 散金: 3982
- 红花: 56
- 沙发: 56
- 帖子: 7824
- 在线: 432.1小时
- 虫号: 831048
- 注册: 2009-08-20
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 半导体材料
3楼2012-02-24 08:39:54
yaoyao145
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
- 应助: 116 (高中生)
- 金币: 75998.1
- 散金: 2124
- 红花: 30
- 帖子: 122811
- 在线: 3990.6小时
- 虫号: 1226543
- 注册: 2011-03-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 敏感电子学与传感器
4楼2012-02-24 08:41:20
