| 查看: 3400 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
MMOR reject and resubmit
|
|||
|
昨天刚刚收到的拒稿信，没有经验，求指点。下面是编辑的信： Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject the manuscript as is but I encourage you to resubmit the manuscript. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. Thank you for your submission to MMOR. Unfortunately, the reviews were not positive, and I must reject the paper, though I encourage you to re-submit it if you can address all comments in a revision. Two additional comment that you must address are: 1. You must demonstrate how your work fits into the current body of work. I noticed that the most recent reference is from 2007 (with only one more newer than 2000). That makes me wonder how timely and of general interest your work might be. 2. Machine scheduling is a well-know problem in the operations research, and is typically solved using integer programming. This approach can handle problems that are far more complex than the simple examples that the game theory literature solves theoretically. How does your work relate to that body of work, and what new insights can you offer. Note that in practice, integer programming has been used for decades to solve these and other operational planning problems in industry. 另外一个审稿人的意见在附件里：除了前面的肯定，主要意见是 Overall the results in the paper merit publication. The extensions considered in the paper are important - specially in Section 3. I have one major concern for the paper - its exposition needs to be better. Specially, Section 3 is very loosely written. For instance, it starts with“chain precedence constraint”without formally defining it. It is not clear what a“Sidney-component”is. Definition 1 is a mess - it can be improved by breaking it up into small bits. Theorem 6 has an incomplete sentence (the last sentence ends with the word “under”). If the writing in Section 3 is improved, I have no hesitation in recommending acceptance of this paper. 求意见，求指点 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 SCI写作、投稿、经验 |
» 猜你喜欢
A期刊撤稿
已经有3人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有34人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有17人回复
-
回收溶剂求助
已经有6人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有22人回复
-
申请26博士
已经有5人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
-
求助文献
已经有3人回复
-
投稿返修后收到这样的回复，还有希望吗
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- monthly ，twice monthly and weekly
已经有11人回复
- RSC的杂志，拒稿重投（reject and resubmssion）还需要回复审稿人意见吗？
已经有6人回复
- reject and resubmit
已经有13人回复
- 求助 Reject and Resubmit
已经有6人回复
- 请问 Reject (revise and resubmit) 后重投还有希望吗？
已经有8人回复
- 求助：Materials Chemistry and Physics的word 模板
已经有5人回复
- 审稿4个月，投稿系统显示Reject & Resubmit
已经有17人回复
- 关于Reject and Resubmit？？？？？？
已经有12人回复
- 【资源】Standard Handbook of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engin
已经有3人回复
- reject and resubmit
已经有8人回复
- 【求助】the French Ministry of Education and Research
已经有14人回复
yaoyao145
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
- 应助: 116 (高中生)
- 金币: 75998.1
- 散金: 2124
- 红花: 30
- 帖子: 122811
- 在线: 3990.6小时
- 虫号: 1226543
- 注册: 2011-03-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 敏感电子学与传感器
4楼2012-02-24 08:41:20
wuhd200577
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 26 (小学生)
- 金币: 731
- 散金: 382
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 294
- 在线: 117.1小时
- 虫号: 988817
- 注册: 2010-04-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 结构陶瓷
2楼2012-02-24 08:36:34
qiqiqiqi
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
小木虫发型设计师
- 应助: 1053 (博后)
- 贵宾: 0.422
- 金币: 12494.5
- 散金: 3982
- 红花: 56
- 沙发: 56
- 帖子: 7824
- 在线: 432.1小时
- 虫号: 831048
- 注册: 2009-08-20
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 半导体材料
3楼2012-02-24 08:39:54
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555210
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2147
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
5楼2012-02-24 08:49:29