24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2466  |  回复: 14
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

furymiss

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 投稿被拒,郁闷!我该怎么办?

Ms. No.: CES-D-11-01669
Title: An improved Genetic algorithm for high-constrained large-size two-stage multi-product scheduling of magnetic material

Dear Dr. Liu,

Your manuscript has been given careful consideration and we regret that we are unable to publish it in Chemical Engineering Science. We do not doubt the technical quality of your work, but feel that there is insufficient impact on a broader readership to justify publication in CES instead of a more specialized journal.

Chemical Engineering Science publishes fundamental research that will be of significant interest to a general chemical engineering readership. Papers typically include a thorough discussion of the results and their implications, and have a significant focus on the understanding of the underlying science.

Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to consider your work for Chemical Engineering Science. We are sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion and hope that you will promptly find a more appropriate forum for the presentation of your work.


Sincerely,

Kai Sundmacher
Executive Editor
Chemical Engineering Science

Chemical Engineering Science, Editorial Office
E-mail: chemicales@elsevier.com

[ Last edited by seapass on 2012-1-29 at 17:15 ]
回复此楼
重要的是持之以恒!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

llc_0024

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
furymiss(金币+1): 2012-01-29 14:57:50
楼主好好,预祝下次高中
10楼2012-01-29 12:07:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 15 个回答

seapass

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

超哥

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
furymiss(金币+1): ★★★很有帮助 2012-01-29 14:56:52
这样的情况木有办法了,好好修改改投吧
独上高楼。。。
2楼2012-01-29 09:40:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

west1982

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
furymiss(金币+1): ★★★很有帮助 2012-01-29 14:57:01
改改再投吧
楼主好运
下次高中哈
3楼2012-01-29 09:46:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
furymiss(金币+2): ★★★★★最佳答案 2012-01-29 14:57:09
这种情况经常是写作有问题,创新及意义没有说清楚(thorough discussion of the results and their implications,)。找几篇最近的文章,仔细比较一下(从贡献到文章结构,从摘要到引用的文献),将文章改好,找个合适的投。
4楼2012-01-29 09:48:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见