| 查看: 1051 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[求助]
求助翻译
|
|||
|
我们已经针对审稿人的意见在实验部分添加了各个样品的加入量，在这篇文章中Ni/Ti（原子比）的理论值是1:20，在实验中样品的各个元素并没有损失。 确实XPS技术不是一个合适的测定元素含量的方法，他只是一个表面的定性工具，用来定量误差很大。正如审稿人所说ICP是一个比较合适的方法。我们测试XPS的目的是为了验证镍的前躯体硝酸镍是否在400度下完全分解为氧化镍，并不是为了对其晶型定量分析。XPS结构显示硝酸镍在400度下完全分解为氧化镍，Ni/Ti（原子比）为1:25，确实存在一定的误差。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有14人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有19人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有24人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
wolfmanhd(金币+5, 翻译EPI+1): 这是翻译软件翻译的 2012-01-15 10:34:12
爱与雨下(翻译EPI-1): 2012-01-15 12:37:14
爱与雨下(金币-5): 2012-01-15 12:37:29
爱与雨下: epi收回 2012-01-15 12:37:47
爱与雨下(金币-5): 2012-01-15 12:38:17
爱与雨下: google翻译！ 2012-01-15 12:38:22
wolfmanhd(金币+5, 翻译EPI+1): 这是翻译软件翻译的 2012-01-15 10:34:12
爱与雨下(翻译EPI-1): 2012-01-15 12:37:14
爱与雨下(金币-5): 2012-01-15 12:37:29
爱与雨下: epi收回 2012-01-15 12:37:47
爱与雨下(金币-5): 2012-01-15 12:38:17
爱与雨下: google翻译！ 2012-01-15 12:38:22
|
仅供参考 We have sent to the opinions of the part in the experiment added each sample addition amount, in this article Ni/Ti (atomic ratio) is the theoretical 1:20, in the experiment of sample each element and no damage. Really XPS technology is not an appropriate determination method for the determination of the elements, he is just a surface qualitative tools, used to quantitative error is very large. As referees said ICP is a more appropriate method. We test the purpose of the XPS was to examine the body nitric acid nickel nickel before in 400 degrees is the complete decomposition for oxidation nickel, and not for the crystal quantitative analysis. XPS structure shows in 400 degrees nickel nitric acid oxidation nickel for all under decomposition, Ni/Ti (atomic ratio) for pitted, does exist certain error. |
2楼2012-01-14 23:15:01
weichin
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 翻译EPI: 183
- 应助: 18 (小学生)
- 金币: 9734.7
- 红花: 17
- 帖子: 4116
- 在线: 345.2小时
- 虫号: 1490943
- 注册: 2011-11-14
- 专业: 结构陶瓷
【答案】应助回帖
★
wolfmanhd(金币+45, 翻译EPI+1): ★★★很有帮助 2012-01-16 10:48:29
爱与雨下(金币+1): 2012-01-16 11:55:25
wolfmanhd(金币+45, 翻译EPI+1): ★★★很有帮助 2012-01-16 10:48:29
爱与雨下(金币+1): 2012-01-16 11:55:25
| According the reviewers’ comments, we have increased the inputs of each sample in the experiment. The theoretical value of Ni/Ti atomic ratio is 1:25, and no element of the samples in the experiment was lost. The XPS technique is certainly not suitable for measuring the content of each element; but rather, it is only a superficial qualitative tool which causes big errors in quantitative determination. Just as the reviewer pointed out, the ICP is a more appropriated tool. We chose the XPS technique with a view to testing whether the nickel precursor nickel nitrate is completely decomposed into nickel oxide under the temperature of 400 degrees Celsius, rather than to giving a quantitative analysis of its crystal form. The XPS structure showed that nickel nitrate is completely decomposed into nickel oxide under the temperature of 400 degrees Celsius with Ni/Ti atomic ratio being 1:25, and there were certainly some errors. |
3楼2012-01-15 15:31:02
50