| 查看: 2429 | 回复: 12 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
谁能帮忙指导一下SSCI投稿Minor Revision的情况?
|
|||
|
投了一篇文章到SSCI检索的期刊,2011年5月投。 2011.10收到审稿意见,给了一些意见。 2011.12修改稿提交 2011.12.31号,收到编辑意见,看来是没有再送审稿人。显示MiNOR REVISION.编辑的意见对我的蹩脚英语进行了要求。附在下面。但我担心领域问题,没有找专门的英文编辑修改润色,自己修改了几天,请英语好的帮忙看了一遍。.由于大量修改了语法和说法,就没有用红色标出来。 2012.1.3 修改稿再次提交,WITH EDITOR中 请了解情况的虫子们,分析一下文章的命运如何?多久会有状态的变化啊? 要是我的英语还是不过关,编辑会不会愤怒地拒稿了? Editorial Comments This is quite an interesting paper but there are still problems with the presentation (in contrast to the content). * The Highlights do not conform to the Habitat International model (see guide to authors). They should consist of 4 or 5 bulleted points with the major points of the study. As it stands, the abstract and highlights are the same. * There are serious problems with the English. In some sentences there are no verbs. Some statements are incomprehensible. It is suggested that the author consult a competent English editor to review and edit the entire manuscript, including the highlights, abstract and text. * The referencing should be amended to conform to the Habitat International house style. * Habitat International uses section number in whole digits (1, 2, 3,.). I suggest you eliminate the numbering on the 2-doigit sections (i.e., 2.1) but keep the reduced font size and bold titles as they are. * Consider moving Table 2 to an appendix at the end of the paper and use Table and Figure rather than Tab. and Fig. * Does the research suggest policies on agglomeration that government and/or planners might find useful? Include them in the conclusions. |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
麻烦大牛看一下我这个major revision该任何修改?
已经有8人回复
SCI审稿意见回来了,编辑给的moderate revision,麻烦大家帮分析一下,有BB
已经有28人回复
minor revision 除了解决reviewer的问题外还需要注意什么
已经有24人回复
请问minor revision 和 major revision 是怎么区分的?
已经有19人回复
minor revision,除了问题的回答外,一些套话要怎么写的,比如感谢审稿人什么.
已经有13人回复
谁能分享一下JCR的排名吗?(SSCI和SCI)
已经有4人回复
IEEE Trans. Fuzzy System的Minor revision
已经有5人回复
minor revision 修改稿再次under review, 为何?
已经有12人回复
11楼2012-01-04 23:54:51
2楼2012-01-04 16:50:16
3楼2012-01-04 16:50:36
4楼2012-01-04 16:56:54










回复此楼
20