| ²é¿´: 768 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
lufuguangÒø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÖú£¬¹ØÓÚÎïÀíÎü¸½¡¢»¯Ñ§Îü¸½ÓëìʵĹØÏµ£¬ÏÂÃæÊÇÉó¸åÈ˸øµÄÒâ¼û£¬²»ÖªµÀÔõô»Ø´ðÁË
|
|
1.As the kinetic data are fitted well by pseudo-second-order model, it can be said the adsorption mechanism is due to chemisorption. However the value of enthalpy (¦¤H) (table 3£¬¦¤H=-2.3KJ.mol-1) indicates that it is due to physisorption? Would the author please explain it? 2.The authors fitted the experimental data with pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order model. Can the authors explain what the significance is and why the adsorption of hydroquinol followed the pseudo-second-order model? Please give the physical meaning for the adsorption of hydroquinol of this present work. ÇóÔõô»Ø´ð [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-1-7 at 10:56 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÉϺ£¹¤³Ì¼¼Êõ´óѧÕÅÅàÀÚ½ÌÊÚÍŶÓÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÉϺ£¹¤³Ì¼¼Êõ´óѧ¡¾¼¤¹âÖÇÄÜÖÆÔì¡¿¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ˶ʿ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÇóÖúԺʿÃÇ£¬Õâ¸öÈçºÎºÏ³Éѽ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÁÙ¸ÛʵÑéÊÒÓëÉϿƴóÁªÅ಩ʿÕÐÉú1Ãû
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ïë»»¹¤×÷¡£´ó¶àÊý¸ßУ¶¼ÊÇ ÆÀÖ°³ÆÊ± ÈÏ¿É5ÄêÄÚÔÚÔµ¥Î»È¡µÃµÄ³É¹ûÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÐèÒªºÏ³É515-64-0£¬50g£¬Äܽӵ¥µÄÁôÑÔ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
×Ô¼ö¶Á²©
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
дÁËһƪ¡°Ïà±ä´¢Äܼ¼ÊõÔÚÀä¿âÖÐÓ¦Óá±µÄÂÛÎÄ£¬ÂÛÎÄÄÚÈÝÒÔʵÑéΪÖ÷£¬Í¶Ê²Ã´ÆÚ¿¯ºÏÊÊ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
´ø×ʽø×éÇ󲩵¼ÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
×î½ü¼¸ÄêÕеÄѧÉúдÂÛÎIJ»Òý×Ô¼º×é·¢µÄÎÄÕÂ
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Éó¸åÈËÎÊÎü¸½µÈµÈÎÂÏßµÄÏà¹ØÏµÊýÆ«µÍ£¬¸ÃÔõÑù»Ø´ð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÔõôÅжÏÎïÀíÎü¸½»¹ÊÇ»¯Ñ§Îü¸½£¿
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û£¬²»ÊǺܶ®£¬´ó¼Ò°ï°ï棡
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Çë½Ì¹ØÓÚµªÆøÎü¸½µÈÎÂÏßµÄÎÊÌ⣿
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÓйػÄÜÓëÎïÀíÎü¸½¡¢»¯Ñ§Îü¸½µÄ¹ØÏµÎÊÌ⣿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÃÉÍÑÍÁÎü¸½ÖؽðÊôÀë×ÓÊÇÎïÀíÎü¸½»¹ÊÇ»¯Ñ§Îü¸½£¿
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÓйØÉó¸åÈËÌá³öµÄÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û¡ª¡ªÇë½ÌÓ¦¸ÃÔõôÀí½âËûµÄÒâ˼
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÔÚ¹â´ß»¯·´Ó¦ÖÐ,´ß»¯¼Á±íÃæµÄÎü¸½Ñõ(°üÀ¨ÎïÀíÎü¸½ºÍ»¯Ñ§Îü¸½)ÄÜ·ñÓó¬Éù²¨¸Ï³
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0810010415
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 249.4
- É¢½ð: 739
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 91
- ÔÚÏß: 173.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1626727
- ×¢²á: 2012-02-19
- רҵ: ÑùƷǰ´¦Àí·½·¨Óë¼¼Êõ
2Â¥2012-03-14 09:18:57







»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥