| ²é¿´: 898 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
lufuguangÒø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÖú£¬¹ØÓÚÎïÀíÎü¸½¡¢»¯Ñ§Îü¸½ÓëìʵĹØÏµ£¬ÏÂÃæÊÇÉó¸åÈ˸øµÄÒâ¼û£¬²»ÖªµÀÔõô»Ø´ðÁË
|
|
1.As the kinetic data are fitted well by pseudo-second-order model, it can be said the adsorption mechanism is due to chemisorption. However the value of enthalpy (¦¤H) (table 3£¬¦¤H=-2.3KJ.mol-1) indicates that it is due to physisorption? Would the author please explain it? 2.The authors fitted the experimental data with pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order model. Can the authors explain what the significance is and why the adsorption of hydroquinol followed the pseudo-second-order model? Please give the physical meaning for the adsorption of hydroquinol of this present work. ÇóÔõô»Ø´ð [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-1-7 at 10:56 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
΢ÐÅÖ¸Êýû±ä»¯£¬¿ÆÑÐÖ®ÓÑûÔĶÁ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÕâÖÖÇé¿ö»¹ÓÐÏ·Âð
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ͬʽӵ½µç»°ÁË£¬ÎÒȴûÓÐ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
×¼±¸Ã÷ÄêµÄ»ù½ðÁË
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
½ñÄêµÄWR½øÕ¹µ½ÄÄÒ»²½ÁË£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ʱ¼ä´ÁËûÓÖÀ´ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Сľ³æ¿´¼ûÓÐÈËÒѾ֪µÀ½á¹ûÁË
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Õâ¸ö×Ô·¢¼ÓÑõ·´Ó¦µÄ»úÀíÊÇʲô£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
J-J-W²»ÎªÈËÖªµÄÒ»Ãæ
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ûÏûÏ¢¾ÍÊDZ»Ë¢ÁËßÂ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Éó¸åÈËÎÊÎü¸½µÈµÈÎÂÏßµÄÏà¹ØÏµÊýÆ«µÍ£¬¸ÃÔõÑù»Ø´ð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÔõôÅжÏÎïÀíÎü¸½»¹ÊÇ»¯Ñ§Îü¸½£¿
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û£¬²»ÊǺܶ®£¬´ó¼Ò°ï°ï棡
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Çë½Ì¹ØÓÚµªÆøÎü¸½µÈÎÂÏßµÄÎÊÌ⣿
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÓйػÄÜÓëÎïÀíÎü¸½¡¢»¯Ñ§Îü¸½µÄ¹ØÏµÎÊÌ⣿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÃÉÍÑÍÁÎü¸½ÖؽðÊôÀë×ÓÊÇÎïÀíÎü¸½»¹ÊÇ»¯Ñ§Îü¸½£¿
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÓйØÉó¸åÈËÌá³öµÄÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û¡ª¡ªÇë½ÌÓ¦¸ÃÔõôÀí½âËûµÄÒâ˼
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÔÚ¹â´ß»¯·´Ó¦ÖÐ,´ß»¯¼Á±íÃæµÄÎü¸½Ñõ(°üÀ¨ÎïÀíÎü¸½ºÍ»¯Ñ§Îü¸½)ÄÜ·ñÓó¬Éù²¨¸Ï³
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0810010415
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 249.4
- É¢½ð: 739
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 91
- ÔÚÏß: 173.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1626727
- ×¢²á: 2012-02-19
- רҵ: ÑùƷǰ´¦Àí·½·¨Óë¼¼Êõ
2Â¥2012-03-14 09:18:57











»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥