| ²é¿´: 1852 | »Ø¸´: 13 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
hushaohuaгæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÎÒÕâ¸öСÐÞÊDz»ÊÇÒª±¯¾ç±¯¾çÁË£¿
|
|
|
Ͷ¸å¹ú¼ÊijÆÚ¿¯£¬ÉϴθøÁË´óÐÞ£¬ÐÞºóÓÐÒ»¸ö¸ºÃæÆÀ¼Û£¨ËµÎÒûÓÐÐÞ¸ÄËûµÄÎÊÌ⣩£¬ÁíÍâÁ½¸öÍÆ¼ö·¢±í£¬±à¼¸øÁËСÐÞ£¬ÓÚ12.21ÈÕÌá½»£¬Ìá½»ºó´¦ÓÚunder review״̬£¬µ«ÊÇÆæ¹ÖµÄÊÇ27ºÅ¸üÐÂÁË״̬ʱ¼ä£¬µ«ÊÇ»¹ÊÇunder review¡£ÊDz»ÊÇÒÔǰÄǸöÉó¸åÈË»¹ÊDz»ÂúÒ⣬¾ÜÁË£¬±à¼ÕÒÈËÖÙ²ÃÁË£¿ìþìý°¡¡£ ¸½Òâ¼û£º Reviewer #1: Unfortunately, the second revision maintains the same problems of the first one. Although the authors claim that green slogans and the nomenclature used are present in other articles, I think that is the role of the reviewer warning and ensure that this kind of concept confusion is not proper for a journal with the quality of the xxx. Some figures that do not provide useful information to readers were also maintained by the authors. Reviewer #2: The paper has improved after considering all the reviewers comments. I do suggest that it is publish as it is. Thank you. Reviewer #3: The revised paper in my view has improved above the level necessary for a publication in xxx and therefore I recommend it to be accepted. I just miss a notation list as there are numerous variables in the text. Comments from the Editor£º One reviewer is still negative, two are positive. Would you try to make one more round with as many improvements as possible? One more formal issue: For books, thesis, reports etc. - would you provide both the place and country where the book was published? [ Last edited by seapass on 2012-1-16 at 12:40 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
272·Ö²ÄÁÏ×ÓÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ46È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤300Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ43È˻ظ´
290Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³Ì985£¬365·Ö£¬
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ɽ¶«¸ßУ½Ìʦ¿¼ºË³¬¼¶ÎÞµ×Ïߣ¬Ô±¹¤¹ý²»ÏÂÈ¥À²
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
085410 273Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
297Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
291Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
¼ÆËã»ú22408 281·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
316Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
ÎÒÊDz»ÊÇÒª±¯¾ç£¿
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
CCͶ¸å±¯¾çÁË£¡
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
under reviewÁË£¬ Æíµ»ÓиöºÃ½á¹û¡¡
ÒѾÓÐ203È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸å²»µ½Ò»¸öÔ¾ÍRequired Reviews Completed£¬ÊDz»ÊÇÒª±¯¾çÁ˰¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸å±¯¾ç£¬Éó¸åÈ˽ÐÎÒͶshort paper
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¿´À´ÊDz»ÊÇÒª±¯¾çÁ˰¡
ÒѾÓÐ42È˻ظ´
ÕâÊDz»ÊDZ¯¾çÁË£¿£¿£¿
ÒѾÓÐ26È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎÄСÐÞ16ÌìÁË£¬»¹ÊÇPeer review in process£¬²»»á±¯¾ç°É
ÒѾÓÐ39È˻ظ´
СÐÞ±ä³ÉÁË´óÐÞ£¬»á²»»á±¯¾ç°¡
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
JAPͶ¸å״̬½âÎö£¬ÊDz»ÊÇÒª±¯¾çÁË£¬×ż±£¡
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎÄСÐÞ£¬µ«²»ÏëÔÚ¸ÃÔÓÖ¾·¢±íÁË Ôõô°ì£¿
ÒѾÓÐ26È˻ظ´
¿´Ñù×ÓÎÒÊDz»ÊÇÒª±¯¾çÁË£¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
under review¿ìËĸöÔÂÁË£¬ÊDz»ÊÇÒª±¯¾ç£¿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ReviseÊDz»ÊÇÒâζ×ÅСÐÞС¸Ä¾ÍÖÐ?
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
angewandteͶ¸å24ÌìÁË£¬Ã»ÓÐÈκÎÏûÏ¢£¬ÊDz»ÊDZ¯¾çÁË£¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸å±¯¾çÁË£¬´ó¹ýÄêµÄºÜÉËÐÄ£¬ÇóÖú£¬ÕâËãÊÇʲôÇé¿ö£¿
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
СÐÞûÓÐÍêÈ«»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼û£¬»á²»»á±¯¾ç°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
AMBÂÛÎı¯¾ç£¬Ð¡Ä¾³æÒ²´ò»÷ÎÒ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎÄÊDz»ÊDZ¯¾çÁË
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ÓбÈÎÒ¸ü±¯¾çµÄÂð£¿ËµËµÄã×Éó¸åʱ¼äµÄһƪÎÄÕÂ
ÒѾÓÐ40È˻ظ´
±¯¾çµÄ¸å×ÓÈÏÕæÐ޸ĺóÔÙͶÕâ¸öÔÓÖ¾¿ÉÒÔ²»£¿
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
¡¾·ÖÏí¡¿ÄãµÄÅ®ÅóÓÑÆ¢Æø±©Ô꣬ÊDz»ÊÇÒòΪ¡¡¡¾ÒÑËÑË÷ÎÞÖØ¸´¡¿
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
yituyitu
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 17 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3923.1
- É¢½ð: 53
- ºì»¨: 12
- Ìû×Ó: 797
- ÔÚÏß: 121.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 483519
- ×¢²á: 2007-12-26
- רҵ: ΢ÉúÎï×ÊÔ´Óë·ÖÀàѧ
3Â¥2011-12-31 09:07:33
yangsh_nj
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 97 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 4396.9
- É¢½ð: 9795
- ºì»¨: 23
- Ìû×Ó: 1763
- ÔÚÏß: 1493Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1373354
- ×¢²á: 2011-08-19
- רҵ: Ô˶¯ÉúÀíѧ
2Â¥2011-12-31 09:01:21
hushaohua
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 30.2
- É¢½ð: 65
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 42
- ÔÚÏß: 31.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1556726
- ×¢²á: 2011-12-30
- רҵ: ÖÆÔìϵͳÓë×Ô¶¯»¯
4Â¥2011-12-31 09:12:09
czl-ee
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 60 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 10461
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 354
- ÔÚÏß: 116.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 245198
- ×¢²á: 2006-04-23
- רҵ: ÌØÖÖҽѧ(º½¿Õ¡¢º½Ìì¡¢º½º£
5Â¥2011-12-31 09:12:18













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥