24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1513  |  回复: 2

lixingliang

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 紧急求助!如何回答reviewer重做实验的建议

时逢圣诞期间,以为老外休假,没想到今天收到主编回复,要求大修(所投杂志是Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology ),和导师讨论后意见出现分歧,不知道该怎么办,向大家求助。
求助问题1:有两个reviewer回复意见,都提出语言需要改进,老板很坚决的说不会花钱找公司改文章,顶多找个native speaker免费修改,这是老板的决定,本人没办法说服花钱找公司改。
求助问题2:我的研究是寻找一种药物的作用靶点,其中一个reviewer提出药物处理浓度太高,以至于结果不可信,建议用LD50的40% and 80%的浓度重复试验。也就是说需要所有的实验重新做,老板也很坚决的说了,实验不会重复,也不会补数据,因为处理的药物和处理对象都没有了,不可能再做了。这可怎么办啊?如果不按照reviewer的建议以低浓度药物重复试验,会不会直接被拒??
以上是主要的问题,其他的都是很小的问题。先粘贴editor回复如下:
Dear Dr. ###,
In regard to your manuscript ###," we now have the reviewer's comments. Based on these comments, we see that your manuscript needs Major revision. I would appreciate it if you could address these points in your revision. Please consider the reviewer's comments very carefully in revising your manuscript
and prepare a detailed "point-by-point" explanation of your revision/rebuttals. You are not required to follow every suggestion, but please provide your reasons for each rebuttal.
For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.
Thank you for the opportunity to review your manuscript, and we look forward to receiving your revision.
John Marshall Clark, PhD
Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: This manuscript presents interesting results and provides useful methods for molluscicidal mechanism of A on Oncomelania hupensis. However, in my knowledge, the concentrations of A and Nic exposed to snails are too high to obtain the reliable results. The concentrations of 40% and 80% LD50 are much better for the study of molluscicidal mechanism. If possible, the authors should use the proper concentrations to repeat this study.
The paper requires a revision of the language and grammar which should be done with the assistance of someone who is more conversant with the language.
Reviewer #2:
The authors investigated the effect of A on snail mitochondria. The molluscicidal activity of Ais already well established. The present investigations now provide some additional data on the possible mode of action.
Generally, the paper is well prepared, the methods applied are appropriate and the conclusions drawn are conclusive.However, there are a number of points which need careful consideration before publication can be recommended:
*     The paper needs a very comprehensive revision with respect to English grammar and syntax.
*     Please write ginkgolic acids and niclosamide with a small initial letter throughout the manuscript
*     The investigations cited in reference [14] were conducted with LLC-MK(2) as well as HaCaT cells.
*     Page 7, line 1-2: Schistosomiasis joponica should be changed to S. japonica
*     Page 9: As described in "Statistical Analysis" correlation coefficients were calculated. However, no such results are given.
*     Page 9: Section 3.1 could entirely be deleted as most of these information are already given in the Materials and Methods section.  
    *     Page 10, line 4: LD50 values at 12 h are also shown in Tab. 2
*     Page 10, Tab. 2: What statistical test was applied for the calculation of p-values? The legend to Tab. 2 refers to superscripts which do not occur in the Table.
*     Page 11, line 3: According to Fig. 4 the expression of adenylate kinase does already decrease at 12 h while the mRNA level for cytochrome b seems to drop down only after 24 and 48 h. This disagreement needs to be solved.
*     Page 11, line 16-18. Unpublished work should not be cited.
*     Page 12, line 13: Expression of five mitochondrial enzymes was allegedly investigated. ?
*     Page 13: Citation of reference 10 is incomplete.
我们实验室的人都不容易毕业,原因吗,这个大家都懂得 这篇文章能否发表对我意义很大,希望大家能伸出援助之手,帮帮我想想应对之策。
祝大家圣诞快乐,元旦快乐!!
PS 本人金币攒了很长时间,还是不多,先发一点,论文顺利的话,全部发完,在所不惜!!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

我不管你看起看不起我,我都是个演员
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lixingliang

新虫 (小有名气)

还需要再说明一下
有关是否用低浓度药物重复试验,老板说他已经想好应对策略:因为我们实验的目的是寻找药物作用靶位,所以需要高浓度的药物来处理,但我对此很不理解,如果低浓度的药物有相同效果,为啥不用低浓度呢?
我不管你看起看不起我,我都是个演员
2楼2011-12-28 23:13:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lixingliang

新虫 (小有名气)

为什么没人回应呢
我不管你看起看不起我,我都是个演员
3楼2011-12-29 12:33:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lixingliang 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 3/150 2026-08-29 03:23 by gy1nBQXYQJqL
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +16 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-29 00:28 by winsaint
[基金申请] 国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论 (金币+15) +13 晴天加油 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-28 18:36 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 系统查不到 +11 董八千 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 18:06 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +11 eulota 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 14:22 by 火星超人xi
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +4 gdd2018 2026-08-28 9/450 2026-08-28 14:22 by jklily
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +5 yuleib84 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 00:02 by yudaoqian88
[基金申请] 申请删除本帖 +6 lyz123lyz 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-27 17:31 by 宁静致远sy
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项 +23 koalala 2026-08-24 26/1300 2026-08-26 14:29 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +9 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by 南海小哥
信息提示
请填处理意见