24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 381  |  回复: 2

ydyeung

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 看看这个编辑意见 已有2人参与

两个审稿人一个小修(就让加两个文献),一个大修(4个问题需要补充说明)。但是编辑说大修不能解决问题,于是拒了。又说让重投,这样的情况是不是编辑倾向于不要这个工作呢?下面是编辑的原话:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in xxx.  It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed.  The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision.  In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in  xxx.
>
>However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider within 60 days at the latest a revised new manuscript that revises the current work to include such data and analysis (assuming no related data is published in the interim). This revision new manuscript should address the reviewers’ comments and your cover letter should include a point-by-point response to the concerns.
>
>NOTE:  The resubmitted work will have a new submission date and a new manuscript number.

[ Last edited by ydyeung on 2011-12-5 at 21:07 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

smilerobin

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
应该是个大修吧,好好修改应该是有希望的,编辑还是希望能给你个机会的
2楼2011-12-05 21:08:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
模板。we would be happy to consider within 60 days - 认真修改,就很有希望。
3楼2011-12-05 22:03:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ydyeung 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见