| 查看: 5288 | 回复: 137 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 PC-EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
大家帮我瞧瞧这审稿意见，认真修回之后被收录的概率有多大？？
|
|||
|
首先，这是编辑给的信息： We have received reviewer's reports on your above manuscript. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 30 days. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, 两个审稿人，第一个的总体意见如下： The manuscript on "Biodegradation characteristics and bioaugmentation potential of a novel quinoline-degrading strain of Bacillus sp. isolated from petroleum-contaminated soil" is very interesting and gives a lot of information about quinoline biodegradation. 这个审稿人共给出9条意见，前六条是参考文献格式问题，后三条是英语句子写的不好，有三个句子，审稿人意见给我改过来了，并且含蓄的说“是不是这样写会更好”，事实上，审稿人的句子真的比我写的要好N倍…… 第二个审稿人的意见总体意见如下： This work is an interesting study related to the biodegradation of quinoline, a relevant organic pollutant from oil products. My main criticisms are the omission of several results in the form of a figure or table, such as sections 3.2 and 3.3, which discuss results that are not shown regarding the effect of operating conditions and the range of substrate degradation. The paper would benefit from showing these results in a figure or table in order to complement the discussion.，后面大体的意思就是讨论部分可以在深入一点 如果按照要求返回，被收录的概率有多大啊？各位有经验的虫友帮我瞧瞧哈！  希望顺利被收录啊！！！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
实名举报：华南理工大学物理与光电学院副院长李志远婚内两次出轨女学生（博士）
已经有6人回复
-
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有5人回复
-
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复
-
各位大神，目前国内有哪些比较好用的逆合成软件？
已经有10人回复
-
申博发邮件
已经有10人回复
-
国社科系统bug了，是不是要放榜了？
已经有9人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组｜2027级博士研究生招生公告
已经有8人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组招收博士研究生
已经有8人回复
84楼2011-11-08 10:34:50
2楼2011-11-08 08:23:20
3楼2011-11-08 08:25:02
5楼2011-11-08 08:26:36