24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3878)
>文献求助 (386)
>虫友互识 (369)
>导师招生 (354)
>硕博家园 (111)
>休闲灌水 (103)
>博后之家 (94)
>招聘信息布告栏 (92)
>论文投稿 (92)
>考博 (80)
>催化 (57)
>公派出国 (54)
>基金申请 (48)
>考研 (47)
>论文道贺祈福 (43)
>教师之家 (41)

返回列表

本帖产生 1 个 PC-EPI ，点击这里进行查看

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

tuobaohua

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

[交流] 大家帮我瞧瞧这审稿意见，认真修回之后被收录的概率有多大？？

首先，这是编辑给的信息：
We have received reviewer's reports on your above manuscript. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 30 days. If you are submitting a revised manuscript,

两个审稿人，第一个的总体意见如下：
The manuscript on "Biodegradation characteristics and bioaugmentation potential of a novel quinoline-degrading strain of Bacillus sp. isolated from petroleum-contaminated soil" is very interesting and gives a lot of information about quinoline biodegradation.
这个审稿人共给出9条意见，前六条是参考文献格式问题，后三条是英语句子写的不好，有三个句子，审稿人意见给我改过来了，并且含蓄的说“是不是这样写会更好”，事实上，审稿人的句子真的比我写的要好N倍……

第二个审稿人的意见总体意见如下：
This work is an interesting study related to the biodegradation of quinoline, a relevant organic pollutant from oil products. My main criticisms are the omission of several results in the form of a figure or table, such as sections 3.2 and 3.3, which discuss results that are not shown regarding the effect of operating conditions and the range of substrate degradation. The paper would benefit from showing these results in a figure or table in order to complement the discussion.，后面大体的意思就是讨论部分可以在深入一点

如果按照要求返回，被收录的概率有多大啊？各位有经验的虫友帮我瞧瞧哈！