[½»Á÷] ´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒÇÆÇÆÕâÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÈÏÕæÐÞ»ØÖ®ºó±»ÊÕ¼µÄ¸ÅÂÊÓжà´ó£¿£¿

Ê×ÏÈ£¬ÕâÊDZ༭¸øµÄÐÅÏ¢£º We have received reviewer's reports on your above manuscript. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 30 days. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, Á½¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬µÚÒ»¸öµÄ×ÜÌåÒâ¼ûÈçÏ£º The manuscript on "Biodegradation characteristics and bioaugmentation potential of a novel quinoline-degrading strain of Bacillus sp. isolated from petroleum-contaminated soil" is very interesting and gives a lot of information about quinoline biodegradation. Õâ¸öÉó¸åÈ˹²¸ø³ö9ÌõÒâ¼û£¬Ç°ÁùÌõÊDzο¼ÎÄÏ׸ñʽÎÊÌ⣬ºóÈýÌõÊÇÓ¢Óï¾ä×ÓдµÄ²»ºÃ£¬ÓÐÈý¸ö¾ä×Ó£¬Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û¸øÎҸĹýÀ´ÁË£¬²¢ÇÒº¬ÐîµÄ˵¡°ÊDz»ÊÇÕâÑùд»á¸üºÃ¡±£¬ÊÂʵÉÏ£¬Éó¸åÈ˵ľä×ÓÕæµÄ±ÈÎÒдµÄÒªºÃN±¶¡­¡­ µÚ¶þ¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û×ÜÌåÒâ¼ûÈçÏ£º This work is an interesting study related to the biodegradation of quinoline, a relevant organic pollutant from oil products. My main criticisms are the omission of several results in the form of a figure or table, such as sections 3.2 and 3.3, which discuss results that are not shown regarding the effect of operating conditions and the range of substrate degradation. The paper would benefit from showing these results in a figure or table in order to complement the discussion.£¬ºóÃæ´óÌåµÄÒâ˼¾ÍÊÇÌÖÂÛ²¿·Ö¿ÉÒÔÔÚÉîÈëÒ»µã Èç¹û°´ÕÕÒªÇ󷵻أ¬±»ÊÕ¼µÄ¸ÅÂÊÓжà´ó°¡£¿¸÷λÓо­ÑéµÄ³æÓÑ°ïÎÒÇÆÇƹþ£¡ Ï£Íû˳Àû±»ÊÕ¼°¡£¡£¡£¡£¡

»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥