| ²é¿´: 1166 | »Ø¸´: 9 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ESEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
Hugbum-Xia½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
Encountering a unfair rejection
|
||
|
This morning, I logged in my email desperately as usual expecting good news from the editor of the journal which I sent my research paper to, but this time I was upset and depressed by the rejection letter from the chief-editor who decided to reject my long-time prepared paper just for a simple reason of lack of novelty from one of my 3 recommended reviewers! I read through the review comments carefully, but it only occurred to me that there was no sense of the comments the reviewer presented. I can¡¯t agree with the conclusion the reviewer drawed from my paper, what¡¯s more, I really did suspect the authotity and academic background of the peer reviewer. When I continued to read comments from other reviewers, I found a kind of warm and encourageous that one of them even highly praised of my painstaking exploration and reasonable feasibility of this endeavor of my innovative idea. So I can draw the conclusion that same paper sending to different reviewers will come out diffenrent decisions and results, and it is of the most significance to choose the reviewers who are most favorable to your paper and take this lesson as an inadoptable example that do not have a try on some one who knows nothing in your field but with a great reputation and popularity. What I am planning to do is another journal for change, and I will be more patient and cautious this time. However, I want to finally express here is: I will not keep hating this reviewer who put forward some unfair judgment to my paper, and I will thank him from the heart for his lessons to me on the tough and bumpy road to a successful scientific research course. [ À´×Ô¿ÆÑмÒ×å ʳƷ¿ÆÑ§ ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
281Çóµ÷¼Á£¨0805£©
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
»·¾³ÁìÓòÈ«¹úÖØµãʵÑéÊÒÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿1-2Ãû
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶306Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì½ò´óѧ»¯Ñ§¹¤ÒÕרҵ£¨081702£©315·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
302Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
26²©Ê¿ÉêÇë
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
268Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
311Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
±»ÎÒÑÔÖУºÐÂÄ£°å²»Ç¿µ÷¸ñʽÁË£¬¼Ùר¼Ò¿ªÊ¼¹Ü¸ñʽÁË
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
¡ï
Сľ³æ(ɳ·¢+1£¬½ð±Ò+0.5):¹§Ï²ÇÀ¸öɳ·¢£¬ÔÙ¸ø¸öºì°ü
Сľ³æ(ɳ·¢+1£¬½ð±Ò+0.5):¹§Ï²ÇÀ¸öɳ·¢£¬ÔÙ¸ø¸öºì°ü
|
2Â¥2011-10-18 16:16:20
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.2):ÇÀÁ˸öС°åµÊ£¬¸ø¸öºì°ü
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.2):ÇÀÁ˸öС°åµÊ£¬¸ø¸öºì°ü
|
3Â¥2011-10-18 16:22:15
|
4Â¥2011-10-18 20:57:07
¡ï
lppv(½ð±Ò+1): you also can write what you experience and your feelings here. welcome to english cafe. 2011-10-18 21:28:57
lppv(½ð±Ò+1): you also can write what you experience and your feelings here. welcome to english cafe. 2011-10-18 21:28:57
I really appreciate your writting ability,great! |
5Â¥2011-10-18 21:22:14
witch_girl
½ð³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- ESEPI: 53
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.903
- ½ð±Ò: 1333.9
- É¢½ð: 15217
- ºì»¨: 105
- ɳ·¢: 52
- Ìû×Ó: 14445
- ÔÚÏß: 1679.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 857925
- ×¢²á: 2009-09-27
- רҵ: ÐÅÏ¢´¦Àí·½·¨Óë¼¼Êõ
- ¹ÜϽ: English Cafe

6Â¥2011-10-18 22:34:56
clyp
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1818.7
- É¢½ð: 702
- ºì»¨: 7
- ɳ·¢: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 2239
- ÔÚÏß: 603Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1408676
- ×¢²á: 2011-09-20
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ¹âѧºÍ¹âµç×Ó²ÄÁÏ

7Â¥2011-10-20 21:21:25
½¡Íü
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 751
- É¢½ð: 533
- ºì»¨: 3
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1188
- ÔÚÏß: 86.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1344576
- ×¢²á: 2011-07-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Íâ¹úÓïÑÔ

8Â¥2011-10-21 00:03:52
ÄäÃû
Óû§×¢Ïú (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1053.6
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 94
- ÔÚÏß: 35.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 0
- ×¢²á: 2013-10-11
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¶¯Á¦Ñ§Óë¿ØÖÆ
9Â¥2014-06-03 21:03:59
Coble
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
ƽµ×Ð¡Óæ´¬
- Ó¦Öú: 37 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 4696.1
- É¢½ð: 441
- ºì»¨: 21
- Ìû×Ó: 3314
- ÔÚÏß: 389.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 573807
- ×¢²á: 2008-06-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½á¹¹ÌÕ´É

10Â¥2014-06-05 08:27:58













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
