24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1026  |  回复: 9
本帖产生 1 个 ESEPI ,点击这里进行查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

Hugbum-Xia

金虫 (著名写手)

[交流] Encountering a unfair rejection

This morning, I logged in my email desperately as usual expecting good news from the editor of the journal which I sent my research paper to, but this time I was upset and depressed by the rejection letter from the chief-editor who decided to reject my long-time prepared paper just for a simple reason of lack of novelty from one of my 3 recommended reviewers! I read through the review comments carefully, but it only occurred to me that there was no sense of the comments the reviewer presented. I can’t agree with the conclusion the reviewer drawed from my paper, what’s more, I really did suspect the authotity and academic background of the peer reviewer. When I  continued to read comments from other reviewers, I found a kind of warm and encourageous that one of them even highly praised of my painstaking exploration and reasonable feasibility of this endeavor of my innovative idea. So I can draw the conclusion that same paper sending to different reviewers will come out diffenrent decisions and results, and it is of the most significance to choose the reviewers who are most favorable to your paper and take this lesson as an inadoptable example that do not have a try on some one who knows nothing in your field but with a great reputation and popularity.
What I am planning to do is another journal for change, and I will be more patient and cautious this time. However, I want to finally express here is: I will not keep hating this reviewer who put forward some unfair judgment to my paper, and I will thank him from the heart for his lessons to me on the tough and bumpy road to a successful scientific research course.

[ 来自科研家族 食品科学 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 Hugbum-Xia 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见