24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3983  |  回复: 19
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

guoyuming

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] JACS全文投稿一个半月,无消息 已有17人参与

8月底投了一篇全文到JACS,8月31日主编将文章分到了Yang Peidong手里,到现在快一个半月了,没有任何消息,担心中,有经验的虫虫说说看什么情况呀,审稿时间是不是有点儿长了呀,现在敢发信问吗


审稿结果已经收到,杯具了!一共四个审稿人,第一个要求大修,第二、三个要求小修,第四个审稿人拒了(他似乎对我们的研究体系持保留态度,从意见中可以推测出该审稿人是谁,我们的研究体系与该审稿人之前的研究体系有所不同),下面附上简单的审稿结果:

Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Reconsider after major revisions.
Significance: High (suitable for JACS)
Novelty: High (suitable for JACS)
Broad interest: High (suitable for JACS)
Scholarly presentation: Moderate (not suitable for JACS)
Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In Part
Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: No
Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: In Part

Reviewer: 2
Recommendation: Publish in JACS after minor revisions.
Significance: High (suitable for JACS)
Novelty: High (suitable for JACS)
Broad interest: High (suitable for JACS)
Scholarly presentation: Moderate (not suitable for JACS)
Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In Part
Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes
Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: In Part

Reviewer: 3
Recommendation: Publish in JACS after minor revisions.
Significance: High (suitable for JACS)
Novelty: High (suitable for JACS)
Broad interest: High (suitable for JACS)
Scholarly presentation: High (suitable for JACS)
Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: In Part
Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: Yes

Reviewer: 4
Recommendation: Publish elsewhere.
Significance: Moderate (not suitable for JACS)
Novelty: Moderate (not suitable for JACS)
Broad interest: High (suitable for JACS)
Scholarly presentation: Moderate (not suitable for JACS)
Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In Part
Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes
Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: Yes

[ Last edited by guoyuming on 2011-11-3 at 13:11 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

guoyuming

金虫 (正式写手)


秋天白云(金币+1): 鼓励交流! 2011-10-11 18:40:32
ACS期刊的审稿周期貌似相对较短一些吧
3楼2011-10-11 12:27:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 20 个回答

chuanqili

新虫 (正式写手)

★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
秋天白云(金币+1): 鼓励交流! 2011-10-11 18:40:25
这还比较正常,不超过三个月一般不用问。
2楼2011-10-11 12:23:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

434602804

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
好牛啊,什么时候能到这种高度。。
初学乍练~
4楼2011-10-11 14:59:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bjxmqp

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

Rainman


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
1楼: Originally posted by guoyuming at 2011-10-11 12:21:52:
8月底投了一篇全文到JACS,8月31日主编将文章分到了Yang Peidong手里,到现在快一个半月了,没有任何消息,担心中,有经验的虫虫说说看什么情况呀,审稿时间是不是有点儿长了呀,现在敢发信问吗

没有消息就是好消息啊
人们象风暴,喧嚣不止。我却只是静静地叹息。因为我发现,风的暴力会消失,会被时光的海洋吞噬;而叹息却同上帝一道,永存下去。
5楼2011-10-11 17:16:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见