| 查看: 4039 | 回复: 53 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
稿子拒了，一个审稿人，散BB求分析
|
|||
|
General comments: Good introduction and use of relevant references. The site description is also good and the methodology used is well described. However, there is not much new here in terms of techniques used. More importantly, the analysis of the data is primarily of the type "curve-plotting" with very little detailed analysis. The data seems to be of good quality and as such, I feel that the authors could have done more with it, e.g.,***省略, etc. The discussion chapter is very general and deals with issues that are not shown in the results cahpter, and sometimes not supported by the data. The conclusions presented are also mostly qualiative and (in some cases) not clearly supported by the data presented. Recommendations (both practical for the mine site as well as for continued work) are lacking. Some additional specific comments: ,***省略 EDITOR'S DECISION: The editor suggest rejection with resubmission. The dataset and case study are interesting but the general analysis and discussion is poor and not novel. More could be done also to provide to the reader some clear statement about what it is adviced or what can be done or not to monitor, study and forecast the evolution So the authors should take their time to improve the manuscript for a resubmission to the journal |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
延安大学回应“副教授留绝笔信”：确已离世，正核实举报内容
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有23人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有22人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有11人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 文章被Mater lett拒，审稿人的理由是有一个数据不信！
已经有16人回复
- [求助] sci论文revise, 其中一个拒稿的审稿人意见该如何回复？
已经有14人回复
- IEEE 投稿后只返回一个专家的审稿意见，其它6个审稿人都拒审，文章还有希望吗？
已经有16人回复
- 审稿人要求大修，却被编辑给拒了，是否可以申诉？
已经有15人回复
- ACS投稿 三个审稿人一个拒稿 拒稿的那个人提出的东西也要回答吗？
已经有23人回复
- 自己的文章被拒，反而成了审稿人！
已经有50人回复
- 审稿人对稿件很消极编辑拒了说可重投怎么办
已经有25人回复
- 有没有两个审稿人一个拒，一个大修，然后编辑reject但是可以resubmit
已经有16人回复
- 徐耀: 从审稿人的角度看如何准备稿件
已经有42人回复
- 一个审稿人对文章没有意见，怎么感谢
已经有17人回复
- 投SCI大修，审稿人2个同意一个拒稿
已经有18人回复
8楼2011-10-08 11:58:02
2楼2011-10-08 11:43:37
4楼2011-10-08 11:47:23
简单回复
leipei.12313楼
2011-10-08 12:12
回复
lucktime(金币+1):谢谢参与
