24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3674  |  回复: 53
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lucktime

木虫 (正式写手)


[交流] 稿子拒了,一个审稿人,散BB求分析

General comments:

Good introduction and use of relevant references. The site description is also good and the methodology used is well described. However, there is not much new here in terms of techniques used. More importantly, the analysis of the data is primarily of the type "curve-plotting" with very little detailed analysis. The data seems to be of good quality and as such, I feel that the authors could have done more with it, e.g.,***省略, etc. The discussion chapter is very general and deals with issues that are not shown in the results cahpter, and sometimes not supported by the data. The conclusions presented are also mostly qualiative and (in some cases) not clearly supported by the data presented. Recommendations (both practical for the mine site as well as for continued work) are lacking.


Some additional specific comments:  ,***省略


EDITOR'S DECISION:

The editor suggest rejection with resubmission. The dataset and case study are interesting but the general analysis and discussion is poor and not novel. More could be done also to provide to the reader some clear statement about what it is adviced or what can be done or not to monitor, study and forecast the evolution
So the authors should take their time to improve the manuscript for a resubmission to the journal
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chenlj8331

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)



lucktime(金币+1):谢谢参与
引用回帖:
1楼: Originally posted by lucktime at 2011-10-08 11:39:44:
General comments:

Good introduction and use of relevant references. The site description is also good and the methodology used is well described. However, there is not much new here in terms of  ...

修改后,重投,希望还是很大的。
4楼2011-10-08 11:47:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 54 个回答

lucktime(金币+1):谢谢参与
讨论重新好好写,重点突出你文章的亮点和重要发现,不要表面地分析数据,简单地引用文献,要深入讨论,挖掘出你的statement。最好选择重新投这个期刊。祝好运!
2楼2011-10-08 11:43:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlanqiang

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)



lucktime(金币+1):谢谢参与
数据有点少,重新分析,重新讨论,很多讨论与数据有脱节现象。修改后重新投吧。
8楼2011-10-08 11:58:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
leipei.12313楼
2011-10-08 12:12   回复  
lucktime(金币+1):谢谢参与
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写 +4 且听虎啸 2026-08-17 5/250 2026-08-18 00:49 by 蔡棒棒菂
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +37 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 86/4300 2026-08-18 00:18 by longsantaizi
[基金申请] 感觉是下周放榜了 +6 angus9576 2026-08-17 11/550 2026-08-17 23:57 by angus9576
[基金申请] filecode=后面第一个是大写字母 +8 wangze12014 2026-08-14 10/500 2026-08-17 17:05 by xter9665
[基金申请] 时间戳变了,能看出什么问题? +4 基诺咪客 2026-08-17 4/200 2026-08-17 16:10 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜? +12 Ldrop2023 2026-08-13 15/750 2026-08-17 15:02 by 小豌豆_发芽
[基金申请] 今天系统多次维护,明天很可能放榜! +8 zju2000 2026-08-16 9/450 2026-08-17 12:20 by lmz0216
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了8-15 +13 archvillain 2026-08-15 25/1250 2026-08-16 20:13 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 2027广东省杰青 +3 奶牛小黑 2026-08-15 6/300 2026-08-16 20:07 by 奶牛小黑
[基金申请] 快农历七夕节了,轻松一下,男人悄悄话,女施主请不要进来。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-16 17:47 by jurkat.1640
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +10 majunge000 2026-08-11 12/600 2026-08-16 08:18 by xli1984
[精细化工] 招聘 金属平磨液,抛光液研发工程师 +3 小天0311 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-16 07:31 by H9PLUS
[基金申请] 各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。 +7 Tide man 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 01:11 by arzu_hma
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +4 yuleib84 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 23:05 by lfy8008
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +4 lnee 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 10:20 by ahsoarli
[基金申请] 不应该看fileCode +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-12 9/450 2026-08-13 14:27 by flydreamws
[基金申请] Filecode 又变了,巨变 +3 WH3796 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 14:13 by 小木虫6752397
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-11 5/250 2026-08-13 12:56 by cratir
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B? +11 Tide man 2026-08-11 11/550 2026-08-13 07:35 by 撸猫猫
信息提示
请填处理意见