24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

zhang25

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 16.1
帖子: 86
在线: 39.9小时
虫号: 862896
注册: 2009-10-04
性别: GG
专业: 机械动力学

[求助] 投Surface Engineering，现在的意见如下，纠结呀，求助大家

Ref.: SUR1109R1
Biodegradable behaviour of AZ91D magnesium alloy in physiological environment
Surface Engineering

Dear Prof. Li

We now have reviewers' comments on the above paper and I regret to inform you that it is not considered suitable for publication in Surface Engineering. Some comments are given below.

We are sorry not to be able to write in a more positive way but we should like to thank you for giving us an opportunity to consider your work for publication.

If your manuscript was rejected following revision and the submission of a Copyright Transfer Form (or other Licence Agreement), any agreement will be annulled on the condition that your submission has now been rejected.
Yours sincerely

T S Sudarshan, Ph.D

Editor-in-chief
Surface Engineering

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: COMMENTS ON THE PAPER WITH REFERENCE No. SUR1109R1

I have found interesting results and an improvement in the abovementioned manuscript, and I think it deserves consideration for publication but not in this journal but in corrosion related journal. However, I still find some conspicuous mistakes that prevent me as a reviewer from accepting it
1. In line 26 of the abstract: biocompatible surface film consisted of Ca8H2(PO4)6.5H2O
Suggestion: substitute "consisting" for "consisted".
2. I suggest to name "Discussion" to the discussion section instead of "Discuss"
3. In Table 3. Regarding the corrosion rate, What do authors mean by (mm a-1) ?
Typical corrosion rates are: mm year-1, mpy, g m-2 day-1, and mA cm-2

Regards,
The Reviewer

回复此楼