| 查看: 1479 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 本帖产生 2 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[求助]
文科文章，英译汉2
|
|||
| At the very least, state action flows from commitments that can contradict those held by religious believers, and there is no neutral standpoint, in either religion or non-religion, from which those differences can be adjudicated – no standpoint, that is, that is not itself a matter of controversy on similar grounds. Moreover, any state is in some measure a creature of its society. The attitudes of state actors are a function of attitudes within the society at large. Indeed, the more responsive a state is to its population, the greater the consonance between social attitudes and those of the state. It is a mistake, then, to think of government as standing entirely outside the fray. It cannot help but embody attitudes prevalent in society, and the considerations that should motivate individuals to exercise toleration are therefore acutely relevant to state actors. As much as anybody, state actors need to understand why they should tolerate beliefs and practices that contradict their personal commitments. The reasons for toleration by the state are a heightened projection of the reasons applicable to citizens generally. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有3人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有4人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有5人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有3人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有3人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有5人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有7人回复
-
为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜？
已经有11人回复
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
爱与雨下(金币+2): ！！~~ 2011-09-05 10:50:21
我的四陪男博(金币+40, 翻译EPI+1): 2011-09-05 18:35:06
sltmac(金币+20): 2011-09-10 08:50:55
sltmac(金币+20): 2011-09-10 08:51:02
sltmac(翻译EPI+1): 欢迎常来本版交流~ 2011-09-10 08:51:12
爱与雨下(金币+2): ！！~~ 2011-09-05 10:50:21
我的四陪男博(金币+40, 翻译EPI+1): 2011-09-05 18:35:06
sltmac(金币+20): 2011-09-10 08:50:55
sltmac(金币+20): 2011-09-10 08:51:02
sltmac(翻译EPI+1): 欢迎常来本版交流~ 2011-09-10 08:51:12
| 最起码的一点是,国家的行为跟随公众评价而变动,这些评价与宗教信徒持有的观点矛盾,没有中立的立场,无论是在宗教或非宗教,在这里这些不同都可以说成是毫无立场，也就是说,在相似的条件下不是争论的实质本身。此外,任何一个国家在某种程度上是其社会的组成体。国家行动者的态度可以说是整个社会的态度。事实上,一个政府对其人口的回应越多，社会态度和国家态度之间的越一致。认为政府是完全处在这种争论之外的想法是错误的。这不能帮助反而会增强这种态度在社会上的流行。因此，去激起社会个体去提高容忍的想法与政府行动者有很大的关系。和每个人都一样，政府人员需要去理解为什么他们应该容忍那些跟他们个人承诺相持的信仰和做法。政府容忍的原因加重了这种原因对市民的投射力度。 |
2楼2011-09-05 10:44:39
3楼2011-09-05 10:45:12
Carena
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 翻译EPI: 94
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.542
- 金币: 6371.2
- 散金: 8657
- 红花: 55
- 沙发: 23
- 帖子: 5968
- 在线: 357.5小时
- 虫号: 1049282
- 注册: 2010-06-29
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 外国语言
4楼2011-09-05 20:41:25
5楼2011-09-06 15:18:29
6楼2011-09-07 22:58:17
7楼2011-09-07 22:58:56
10