| 查看: 1242 | 回复: 6 | ||
| 本帖产生 2 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
文科文章,英译汉2
|
||
| At the very least, state action flows from commitments that can contradict those held by religious believers, and there is no neutral standpoint, in either religion or non-religion, from which those differences can be adjudicated – no standpoint, that is, that is not itself a matter of controversy on similar grounds. Moreover, any state is in some measure a creature of its society. The attitudes of state actors are a function of attitudes within the society at large. Indeed, the more responsive a state is to its population, the greater the consonance between social attitudes and those of the state. It is a mistake, then, to think of government as standing entirely outside the fray. It cannot help but embody attitudes prevalent in society, and the considerations that should motivate individuals to exercise toleration are therefore acutely relevant to state actors. As much as anybody, state actors need to understand why they should tolerate beliefs and practices that contradict their personal commitments. The reasons for toleration by the state are a heightened projection of the reasons applicable to citizens generally. |
» 猜你喜欢
青椒八年已不青,大家都被折磨成啥样了?
已经有11人回复
限项规定
已经有9人回复
免疫学博士有名额,速联系
已经有4人回复
交叉科学部支持青年基金,对三无青椒是个机会吗?
已经有5人回复
国家基金申请书模板内插入图片不可调整大小?
已经有6人回复
国家级人才课题组招收2026年入学博士
已经有5人回复
Fe3O4@SiO2合成
已经有6人回复
青年基金C终止
已经有4人回复
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向
已经有4人回复
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生(考核制)—机械、材料、力学方向
已经有3人回复

【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
爱与雨下(金币+2): !!~~ 2011-09-05 10:50:21
我的四陪男博(金币+40, 翻译EPI+1): 2011-09-05 18:35:06
sltmac(金币+20): 2011-09-10 08:50:55
sltmac(金币+20): 2011-09-10 08:51:02
sltmac(翻译EPI+1): 欢迎常来本版交流~ 2011-09-10 08:51:12
爱与雨下(金币+2): !!~~ 2011-09-05 10:50:21
我的四陪男博(金币+40, 翻译EPI+1): 2011-09-05 18:35:06
sltmac(金币+20): 2011-09-10 08:50:55
sltmac(金币+20): 2011-09-10 08:51:02
sltmac(翻译EPI+1): 欢迎常来本版交流~ 2011-09-10 08:51:12
| 最起码的一点是,国家的行为跟随公众评价而变动,这些评价与宗教信徒持有的观点矛盾,没有中立的立场,无论是在宗教或非宗教,在这里这些不同都可以说成是毫无立场,也就是说,在相似的条件下不是争论的实质本身。此外,任何一个国家在某种程度上是其社会的组成体。国家行动者的态度可以说是整个社会的态度。事实上,一个政府对其人口的回应越多,社会态度和国家态度之间的越一致。认为政府是完全处在这种争论之外的想法是错误的。这不能帮助反而会增强这种态度在社会上的流行。因此,去激起社会个体去提高容忍的想法与政府行动者有很大的关系。和每个人都一样,政府人员需要去理解为什么他们应该容忍那些跟他们个人承诺相持的信仰和做法。政府容忍的原因加重了这种原因对市民的投射力度。 |

2楼2011-09-05 10:44:39

3楼2011-09-05 10:45:12
Carena
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 翻译EPI: 94
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.542
- 金币: 6371.2
- 散金: 8657
- 红花: 55
- 沙发: 23
- 帖子: 5968
- 在线: 357.5小时
- 虫号: 1049282
- 注册: 2010-06-29
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 外国语言

4楼2011-09-05 20:41:25

5楼2011-09-06 15:18:29

6楼2011-09-07 22:58:17

7楼2011-09-07 22:58:56













回复此楼