| 查看: 6577 | 回复: 183 | |||
| 本帖产生 3 个 PC-EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Acta materialia 大修
|
|||
|
第一次试投Acta materialia杂志，由于紧张，此后我每几个小时都会看稿件状态。没想到审稿过程超速，当日投，Editor第三日便送审，送审后第六天便出现Required review completed，心想这下完了，肯定审稿人看都没看就给毙了，没想到又过一日，意见回来了： Dear Dr. ** Please see below the referee's report of your above-mentioned paper. In view of these comments, I regret that I cannot accept your paper for publication in Acta MATERIALIA in its present form. Major revisions are required. Please make the revisions as stated by the referee, and use this on-line submission website for submitting your revised manuscript. Editor's/Reviewer's comments: Reviewer #1: This is an interesting paper. I have not seen previous publications dealing with **. This is an innovative process that appears to offer a way to **. I believe this process will be of interest to readers of Acta Materialia. One concern is***。 正在好好修改，希望能有好结果。 |
回复此楼» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
NTOKy» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有15人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
flyingding: 回帖置顶 论文有消息了。。！！ 2011-09-28 12:47:39
wry3300(金币+5): 奖励 2011-10-06 08:51:22
wry3300(PC-EPI+1): 审稿意见奖励 2011-10-06 08:51:31
flyingding: 回帖置顶 论文有消息了。。！！ 2011-09-28 12:47:39
wry3300(金币+5): 奖励 2011-10-06 08:51:22
wry3300(PC-EPI+1): 审稿意见奖励 2011-10-06 08:51:31
|
语言还有些小问题，其它问题没有了。正在修改中。。 二审用了四天，编辑回复如下： Dear Dr. **, I have now received an independent review of your manuscript. The referee has made suggestions for you to revise the paper. See below review. If you will address these comments in your revised paper, I shall be pleased to consider your manuscript for publication in Acta Materialia. Reviewer #1: Thank you for modifying this paper. The research presented is quite interesting. While the paper is logical in its presentation of the research results, the quality and readability of the English can be improved. I suggest you consult with a colleague for whom English is their first language to improve and remedy the many minor grammatical errors. |
71楼2011-09-28 12:46:35
flyingding: 回帖置顶 论文顺利接收了。 2011-10-06 08:59:11
wry3300(PC-EPI+1): 奖励 2011-10-06 09:14:50
wry3300(PC-EPI+1): 奖励 2011-10-06 09:14:50
|
今天文章顺利接收了，感谢大家的祝福与关注！以下是接收信内容： Dear Dr. **, I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has now been accepted for publication. Please note that this paper may now be sent to the Copy Editor for language correction. You will have the opportunity to comment on the galley proofs, which Elsevier will send to you by e-mail in due course. Thank you for publishing your article in Acta Materialia. Yours sincerely, Richard Wagner Processing Editor Acta Materialia |
138楼2011-10-06 08:58:22
30