24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

本帖产生 3 个 PC-EPI ，点击这里进行查看

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

flyingding

金虫 (小有名气)

PC-EPI: 3
应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1116.5
帖子: 65
在线: 25.9小时
虫号: 850560

[交流] Acta materialia 大修

第一次试投Acta materialia杂志，由于紧张，此后我每几个小时都会看稿件状态。没想到审稿过程超速，当日投，Editor第三日便送审，送审后第六天便出现Required review completed，心想这下完了，肯定审稿人看都没看就给毙了，没想到又过一日，意见回来了：
Dear Dr. **
Please see below the referee's report of your above-mentioned paper. In view of these comments, I regret that I cannot accept your paper for publication in Acta MATERIALIA in its present form. Major revisions are required. Please make the revisions as stated by the referee, and use this on-line submission website for submitting your revised manuscript.

Editor's/Reviewer's comments:
Reviewer #1: This is an interesting paper. I have not seen previous publications dealing with **. This is an innovative process that appears to offer a way to **. I believe this process will be of interest to readers of Acta Materialia.
One concern is***。
正在好好修改，希望能有好结果。

回复此楼

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

NTOKy

» 猜你喜欢

最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章已经有11人回复
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？已经有4人回复
需要合成515-64-0，50g，能接单的留言已经有3人回复
中科院杭州医学所招收博士生一名（生物分析化学、药物递送）已经有3人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名已经有8人回复
26申博自荐已经有7人回复
想换工作。大多数高校都是评职称时认可5年内在原单位取得的成果吗？已经有4人回复
带资进组求博导收留已经有9人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-09-04 10:11:30

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

flyingding

金虫 (小有名气)

PC-EPI: 3
应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1116.5
帖子: 65
在线: 25.9小时
虫号: 850560

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
flyingding: 回帖置顶论文有消息了。。！！ 2011-09-28 12:47:39
wry3300(金币+5): 奖励 2011-10-06 08:51:22
wry3300(PC-EPI+1): 审稿意见奖励 2011-10-06 08:51:31

引用回帖:

65楼: Originally posted by china-2002 at 2011-09-28 08:41:18:
拒了么？？
~~~~祝福~~

语言还有些小问题，其它问题没有了。正在修改中。。
二审用了四天，编辑回复如下：
Dear Dr. **,

I have now received an independent review of your manuscript. The referee has made suggestions for you to revise the paper. See below review.

If you will address these comments in your revised paper, I shall be pleased to consider your manuscript for publication in Acta Materialia.

Reviewer #1: Thank you for modifying this paper. The research presented is quite interesting. While the paper is logical in its presentation of the research results, the quality and readability of the English can be improved. I suggest you consult with a colleague for whom English is their first language to improve and remedy the many minor grammatical errors.