24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

本帖产生 3 个 PC-EPI ，点击这里进行查看

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

flyingding

金虫 (小有名气)

PC-EPI: 3
应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1116.5
帖子: 65
在线: 25.9小时
虫号: 850560

[交流] Acta materialia 大修

第一次试投Acta materialia杂志，由于紧张，此后我每几个小时都会看稿件状态。没想到审稿过程超速，当日投，Editor第三日便送审，送审后第六天便出现Required review completed，心想这下完了，肯定审稿人看都没看就给毙了，没想到又过一日，意见回来了：
Dear Dr. **
Please see below the referee's report of your above-mentioned paper. In view of these comments, I regret that I cannot accept your paper for publication in Acta MATERIALIA in its present form. Major revisions are required. Please make the revisions as stated by the referee, and use this on-line submission website for submitting your revised manuscript.

Editor's/Reviewer's comments:
Reviewer #1: This is an interesting paper. I have not seen previous publications dealing with **. This is an innovative process that appears to offer a way to **. I believe this process will be of interest to readers of Acta Materialia.
One concern is***。
正在好好修改，希望能有好结果。

回复此楼

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

NTOKy

» 猜你喜欢

招博士已经有5人回复
青椒八年已不青，大家都被折磨成啥样了？已经有6人回复
救命帖已经有9人回复
青年基金C终止已经有3人回复
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向已经有4人回复
限项规定已经有7人回复
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生（考核制）—机械、材料、力学方向已经有3人回复
英文综述是否需要润色及查重已经有5人回复
为什么nbs上溴没有产物点出现呢已经有9人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-09-04 10:11:30

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

flyingding

金虫 (小有名气)

PC-EPI: 3
应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1116.5
帖子: 65
在线: 25.9小时
虫号: 850560

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
flyingding: 回帖置顶论文有消息了。。！！ 2011-09-28 12:47:39
wry3300(金币+5): 奖励 2011-10-06 08:51:22
wry3300(PC-EPI+1): 审稿意见奖励 2011-10-06 08:51:31

引用回帖:

65楼: Originally posted by china-2002 at 2011-09-28 08:41:18:
拒了么？？
~~~~祝福~~

语言还有些小问题，其它问题没有了。正在修改中。。
二审用了四天，编辑回复如下：
Dear Dr. **,

I have now received an independent review of your manuscript. The referee has made suggestions for you to revise the paper. See below review.

If you will address these comments in your revised paper, I shall be pleased to consider your manuscript for publication in Acta Materialia.

Reviewer #1: Thank you for modifying this paper. The research presented is quite interesting. While the paper is logical in its presentation of the research results, the quality and readability of the English can be improved. I suggest you consult with a colleague for whom English is their first language to improve and remedy the many minor grammatical errors.