24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 649  |  回复: 3

lijianghua2007

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

[求助] 审稿意见 参考

虫友们,你们以前投稿的审稿意见还有吗?能发给我参考下吧!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

淡泊名利,宁静致远。
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lijianghua2007

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

人呢?
淡泊名利,宁静致远。
2楼2011-08-19 11:05:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lijianghua2007

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

3楼2011-08-19 18:09:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wjy1980

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

lijianghua2007(金币+10): 谢谢你 2011-08-27 09:31:32
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
Manuscript number: 123456
This paper entitled “……”. Followings are my comments:
Authors should justify the significance of the present work in context of extensive literatures. Numbers of important references are missing in the paper! Only piece of information is the structural data. Why UV-VIS spectra of the complex was taken in dmso?? What is the spectra in H2O? What is scientifically novel in the present study?
In view of above, I don't think that the manuscript does warrant publication in its present form. In absence of any chemistry, author should publish the structural data in some appropriate crystallographic journal.
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
This work is an interesting and complete research, but it is better that authors do these comments on their manuscript:
1- The paper has a very short abstract. Authors must be expand abstract and add additional data such as crystallographic data, point group and so on.
2- Authors must be correct references according to the journal guide.
这是我前不久投稿的审稿意见,一个审稿人认为可以发,另一个择认为不行,你可以借鉴一下,希望能帮到你
4楼2011-08-22 21:15:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lijianghua2007 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见