最近投了一篇ACS Nano的文章,刚开始一个人小修,一个要我们投别的刊物(认为达不到top15%);于是编辑又重新找了个仲裁,也是要求小修。但是,今天编辑回信把我们文章给拒了,真是悲哀!请问虫友们这样有必要跟编辑写反驳信吗?
编辑的信内容:As you can see, there are three referee reports, and two are moderately supportive, but one is not. I had a close look at all three, and I agree with the concerns of referee #1 with regards to the novelty of the work. I also believe that the comments of referees 2 and 3, when taken together, will result in large revisions to the manuscript. I realize that you will not be pleased with this decision, but I regret to say that we cannot publish this paper in ACS Nano. At the present time, we send out only about 20% of all manuscripts we receive, and accept about half of those - without very strong support, particularly with regards to novelty, from the referees, we cannot accept the manuscript.
[ Last edited by cxksama on 2011-7-20 at 08:00 ] |