| ²é¿´: 1238 | »Ø¸´: 8 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
kaixinhaгæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
globcom2011 ÆÀÉóÒâ¼û Âú·Ö5·Ö£¿ ×îµÍ·Ö¶àÉÙ£¿ ÓÐÖеÄÂ𣿠ûÖеĴòËã¸ÄͶÄÄÀ ÒÑÓÐ3È˲ÎÓë
|
||
|
globcom2011 ÆÀÉóÒâ¼û Âú·ÖÊÇ5·Ö£¿ ÎÒÊÕµ½µÄÒâ¼û2¸ö×î¸ß4·Ö£¬ÓÐ1¸ö×îµÍ 1·Ö ÓÐÖеÄÂð£¿Ñ§Ð£ÊÇ£¿ ûÖеĴòËã¸ÄͶÄÄÀ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
08¹¤Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á£¬Çóµ¼Ê¦ÊÕ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
0854AI CV·½ÏòÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á323²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧѧ˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
289Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
07»¯Ñ§280·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
300·Ö£¬²ÄÁÏ£¬Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
¡¾¿¼Ñе÷¼Á¡¿»¯Ñ§×¨Òµ 281·Ö£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ËÄ´¨´óѧ£¬³ÏÐÄÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
0854µç×ÓÐÅÏ¢Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Ó¢ÎÄժҪдµÄ²»ºÃ£¬»áÓ°ÏìÆÀÉó½á¹ûÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
SolidWorks¸ß¼¶Áã¼þ½Ì³Ì 2011°æ£¨ÒÑËÑË÷Ã»ÖØ¸´£©
ÒѾÓÐ159È˻ظ´
APLÉó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬ÎÒÈ´±ÀÀ£ÁË£¡
ÒѾÓÐ36È˻ظ´
Ч·ÂÀϺ£¹ê£¬¹ØÓÚµ¥Î»ÍƼöÒâ¼û¡¢Î´ÊÚȨרÀû¡¢ÒѼÓÃÎÄÕµÈ
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
2011 Äê¶ÈµØÇò»¯Ñ§ÁìÓòÏîÄ¿ÆÀÉóÓë×ÊÖú³É¹û·ÖÎö
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
³æ×ÓÃÇ£¬¶¼Õâ¸öʱºòÁ˾ͱðÄÇÓ¢Óï˵ÊÂÁË£¬ÉÏ´«Ò»·ÝcscÆÀÉó±ê×¼
ÒѾÓÐ46È˻ظ´
µ÷²é£ºÄãËùÄܽÓÊܵÄÂÛÎİæÃæ·ÑÊǶàÉÙ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú:Ôõô»Ø´ðÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¿ unnecessarily complicated£¬¼±°¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú¶ÔJCEDÉó¸åÒâ¼ûµÄÀí½â
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
È¥ÄêʯÓÍ»¯¹¤×¨ÏîÆÀÉóÓÐÏûÏ¢ÁËÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
IEEE ICC 2012 ÆÀÉóÒâ¼û Âú·Ö5·Ö£¿ ×îµÍ·Ö¶àÉÙ£¿ ÓÐÖеÄÂ𣿠ûÖеĴòËã¸ÄͶÄÄÀ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
½áºÏר¼ÒÆÀÉóÒâ¼û̸̸Á½ÄêÀ´ÇàÄê»ù½ðµÄÉêÇëÌå»á£¨¶ÒÏÖ³ÐŵÌù£©
ÒѾÓÐ91È˻ظ´

xuanlijuan
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 140.3
- É¢½ð: 25
- Ìû×Ó: 109
- ÔÚÏß: 25.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1163342
- ×¢²á: 2010-12-06
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ¼ÆËã»ú
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
| Â¥Ö÷ÕâÊDZ¯¾çÁË£¿ |
3Â¥2011-07-12 10:50:44
kaixinha
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 281.6
- ºì»¨: 22
- Ìû×Ó: 226
- ÔÚÏß: 24.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1275854
- ×¢²á: 2011-04-24
- רҵ: Ãô¸Ðµç×ÓѧÓë´«¸ÐÆ÷
¡ï
liuyunme(½ð±Ò+1): ×£¸£Ë³Àû£¡·¢ÎÄÕ²»ÊÇ»áÒéÂÛÎÄÒ»ÖÖ;¾¶Å¶£¡ 2011-07-12 23:31:18
liuyunme(½ð±Ò+1): ×£¸£Ë³Àû£¡·¢ÎÄÕ²»ÊÇ»áÒéÂÛÎÄÒ»ÖÖ;¾¶Å¶£¡ 2011-07-12 23:31:18
|
ÎҵľßÌåÆÀ·Ö Relevance and timeliness Technical content and scientific rigour Novelty and originality Quality of presentation Good (4) Solid work of notable importance. (4) Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated. (3) Readable, but revision is needed in some parts. (3) Good (4) Solid work of notable importance. (4) Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated. (3) Readable, but revision is needed in some parts. (3) Acceptable (3) Valid work but limited contribution. (3) Minor variations on a well investigated subject. (2) Substantial revision work is needed. (2) Little (2) Marginal work and simple contribution. Some flaws. (2) Minor variations on a well investigated subject. (2) Unacceptable. (1) |

2Â¥2011-07-12 10:38:17
kaixinha
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 281.6
- ºì»¨: 22
- Ìû×Ó: 226
- ÔÚÏß: 24.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1275854
- ×¢²á: 2011-04-24
- רҵ: Ãô¸Ðµç×ÓѧÓë´«¸ÐÆ÷

4Â¥2011-07-12 18:41:28
visitor958
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
IEEEÔÓÖ¾Óë»áÒéר¼Ò
- Ó¦Öú: 2283 (½²Ê¦)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.05
- ½ð±Ò: 17310
- É¢½ð: 2544
- ºì»¨: 76
- Ìû×Ó: 15735
- ÔÚÏß: 2926.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 489254
- ×¢²á: 2008-01-01
- רҵ: IEEE
5Â¥2011-07-12 21:18:43













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
kaixinha
20