24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 606  |  回复: 2

mahuiyu1261

金虫 (正式写手)


[求助] materials 投稿求助,审稿意见..........................

materials 投稿求助:This paper includes some practically valuable information, but I do not think that this paper is acceptable for publication, for the following reasons. The experiment with only one set of welding parameters is not systematically planned (no description on the optimization process; how and why the set of parameters were chosen). The metallurgical discussion is not well proved by experimental evidence with highly space-resolved data (no comparison with EDS data of Sn-free sample). Additionally, this manuscript has many problems in English, e.g.; comma(,)s, period(.)s, capital and small letters are not properly used; unclear/incomprehensible descriptions/words are seen; etc..
各位大侠看看需不需要在大修改了?还有机会吗?悲剧中............................................
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

whq10513

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

mahuiyu1261(金币+5): 谢谢哦, 2011-06-20 09:45:56
编辑肯定了文章的创新性,就是还要你补做实验,你只有一组参数,没有对照啊,或者说明为什么会选择这个参数,因为没有不掺Sn的EDS作对比,最后的结论跟实验不相符,是不是下的结论太肯定了,再就是语法错误。按照要求不做实验,再尽量避免语法错误,投过去,应该就没有问题了,毕竟创新点被编辑肯定了
2楼2011-06-20 09:43:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
3楼2011-06-20 09:45:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 mahuiyu1261 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见