24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2237  |  回复: 22
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

leighcl

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] Materials Letters拒稿,帮我看看回信的意思!谢谢

Dear XX,

Thank you for submitting the above paper.

We have now received comments on your paper and regret to say that we must turn this paper down.

For your guidance, comments from the review/s are appended below.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. We will be happy to receive other contributions from you.

Yours sincerely,

Editor-in-Chief

Materials Letters

Editor's/Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: The contents of the paper made to give the following comments:
。。。。。。
To summarize, though the paper has some scientific merits, the authors have exclusively presented experimental results and lack of sufficient discussion can be observed. Therefore, the paper is not acceptable in its present form and the reviewer suggests this manuscript be revised substantially and resubmitted.


这好像是说我按照comments修改后,还可以重新投,是不是?但是如果重新投的话,有希望没?

[ Last edited by leighcl on 2011-6-5 at 03:41 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

leighcl

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by xianke5199 at 2011-06-06 23:16:22:
是的,随便编辑怎么处理啊。一般是当做新稿件。

谢谢啊!另外,文章编号还要不要写?在线等
18楼2011-06-06 23:32:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 23 个回答

crystal215

木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

leighcl(金币+1): 2011-06-05 12:18:41
审稿人让你重新修改后,可以再投,编辑根据审稿人的意见给拒稿了,好好修改后可以重投,楼主加油!
2楼2011-06-05 06:45:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

James_ever

金虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

引用回帖:
Originally posted by leighcl at 2011-06-05 03:34:12:
Dear XX,

Thank you for submitting the above paper.

We have now received comments on your paper and regret to say that we must turn this paper down.

For your guidance, comments from the re ...

lack of sufficient discussion ......................





合作写写??
Take few risks early, the bonus following!科研MSN群:FutureChina@groups.live.com
3楼2011-06-05 08:04:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nkb_hit

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

leighcl(金币+1): 2011-06-05 12:19:31
建议按照要求改改,重新投稿,还是很有希望的!
审稿人认为你的文章有创新性,就是文章只有数据的罗列,数据分析太少,你按照要求,分析多一点问题,很有希望!
4楼2011-06-05 11:20:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见