24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2210  |  回复: 20
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

alex1304

银虫 (著名写手)


[交流] 悲剧,reviewer给大修,编辑给据了。。 已有16人参与

Dear ×××,

I have received independent reviews of your manuscript recommending its rejection to major revision. After careful consideration, I am rejecting it. I have included their comments to aid in your future work.

I am sorry that I could not provide a more positive response.

Sincerely,

Editor
×××××××



Reviewer: The manuscript requires significant revision for readability including focus on grammar, spelling, SI units, and general presentation.

It is not clear what the goal of the paper is, i.e. a certain cost or a certain envelope of properties.  The paper comes across as the authors have processed a few random formulations and are presenting characterization on those formulations.  From table 5, it appears that properties are not outstanding and are easily achievable with other polymers.   The authors need to articulate a clear goal for the work and then demonstrate that they achieve those goals.

大家觉得是按照reviewer的意见改了转投其他杂志 还有希望吗?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

alex1304

银虫 (著名写手)


郁闷,我已经找老外改过一次英语了,结果英语语法和表述还是有问题
8楼2011-05-21 19:56:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

alex1304

银虫 (著名写手)


引用回帖:
Originally posted by ggwwmm1234 at 2011-05-21 20:41:14:
  楼主的命运跟我一样,不过我更惨,审稿人先让大修(没提什么意见),大修之后审稿人又直接拒(又没给任何理由,无非就是说语言不痛,做的东西没新意)

呵呵,你那真是最惨的。。。
15楼2011-05-21 21:24:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

alex1304

银虫 (著名写手)


引用回帖:
Originally posted by shy2400 at 2011-05-21 20:43:51:
审稿人意见这么尖锐。。。当然主编会考虑给毙掉的啊。。。

另外,楼主,为什么就一个审稿人的意见呢?如果是一个审稿人的话,主编很定是最后决断人。

就一个审稿意见。
我推荐了三个,估计他就选了其中一个。
17楼2011-05-21 21:25:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 alex1304 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见