[½»Á÷] Óо­ÑéµÄ³æ³æ°ï¿´¿´decision letter£¨JOTE£©£¬ÊÇ·ñÓмÌÐøÐ޸ĵıØÒª£¿

ÈçÌ⣬ҪÇóÎåÖÜÄÚÍê³ÉÐ޸ģ¬¸Ð¾õmission impossible£¬Ïë´òÍËÌùÄÁË¡£ ¾´ÇëÖ¸µã£¡Ð»Ð»£¡ ÒÔÏÂΪÉÏÖÜÎåÊÕµ½µÄdecision letter Dear ¡£¡£¡£, Your manuscript, referenced below, has been reviewed and found to be of potential interest: "¡£¡£¡£¡£" Unfortunately, the manuscript is not acceptable in present form for publication in ¡£¡£¡£. The reviewers have delineated several deficiencies and recommend major revisions which may render the work suitable for publication. If you are willing and able to respond to each of the reviewer's critical comments, we would consider a revised manuscript. Feel free to go to the URL below to submit the revised manuscript, including figures. Please include an author response letter that addresses each point and indicates how the manuscript has been revised. Revised papers are due in the system within five weeks of this message. Figures will appear in color online and in black and white in any print format. While addressing the reviewers' comments, please check each figure carefully to ensure that (1) the figures will reproduce well when printed in black and white and (2) the descriptions in the text and in the captions are sufficiently clear for both print and online versions. It is suggested that you use shapes or patterns so the meaning is clear in color and black and white. Thank you for the opportunity to examine this work. If you have any questions, feel free to contact us at  ¡£¡£¡£. Sincerely, ¡£¡£¡£ For service advisories, tips, and FAQs on the use of the peerx-press system, visit... ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- In accordance with criteria set by..., the acceptance of papers must be determined by the following: A = Acceptable as is O = Optional Revision M = Mandatory Revision R = Rejection ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- Manuscript¡£: Editor's Comments: NOTE TO AUTHOR: It is highly recommended that you have a native English speaking colleague, familiar with the nuanced of the language, proof read and edit your revised technical manuscript prior to your resubmission for possible publication in ¡£¡£¡£. It is the author's responsibility to provide a manuscript that is both technically accurate as well as understandable in English context and grammar. Reviewer Comments: Editorial Board Member Evaluations: Editorial Board Member Recommendation: Reconsider based on responses to issues raised by reviewers Publication Priority: 3 Editorial Board Member (Editorial Board Member Comments to Author): Reviewers indicated that significant revisions are required. Authors should revise the paper base on reviewers' comments. Re-Reviews are required. Éó¸åÈ˵ľßÌåÒâ¼û·Ç³£×Ðϸ£¬²»¹ýÌ«³¤£¬¾Í²»ÌùÁË¡£ Reviewer #1 Evaluations: Recommendation: Rejection Reviewer #2 Evaluations: Recommendation: Optional Revision Reviewer #3 Evaluations: Recommendation: Mandatory Revision [ Last edited by coolxh on 2011-5-17 at 23:14 ]

»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥